Adrian Chadd wrote this message on Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:43 -0800:
> When I've done what you're doing, I end up having these options in my
> minimal config file so opt_xxx.h is correctly populated. That way when
> I point SYSDIR (or whichever variable it is) at the configured kernel
> directory w
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:23:03PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> I think defining UFS options in kernel connfig affect to module too.
> When I define this options in kernel config (w/o options FFS) I got
> ufs.ko with this SU, quota, acl etc.
Nice point I missed in earlier replies. In my sta
Among emails in this thread, Warner Losh wrote:
[ so to avoid replying on per-email bases ]
> (2) is the exact problem I'm working on. Since the design of that will
> allow us to read from the kernel these modules, (1) becomes largely
> irrelevant because the only /boot/loader incursion would be to
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:57:54AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> >> Author: imp
> >> Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
> >> New Revision: 277204
> >> URL: https://sv
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> On 16 January 2015 at 10:48, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
>> Options aren’t supposed to change KBI. Some do, and that’s unfortunate.
>
> Yup, and at least for net80211 I'm going to try really hard to fix that.
>
>> But don’t turn this into a
On 16 January 2015 at 10:48, Warner Losh wrote:
> Options aren’t supposed to change KBI. Some do, and that’s unfortunate.
Yup, and at least for net80211 I'm going to try really hard to fix that.
> But don’t turn this into a rant on how sub-optimal the opt_.h
> intersect with modules. That’
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> On 16 January 2015 at 09:57, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
Author: imp
Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
On 16 January 2015 at 09:57, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>>> Author: imp
>>> Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
>>> New Revision: 277204
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changes
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:51:55AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> +# Pseudo devices.
>>> +device loop# Network loopback
>>> +device random # Entropy device
>>> +devic
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:44 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:23:03PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> New Revision: 277204
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> New
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>> Author: imp
>> Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
>> New Revision: 277204
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
>>
>> Log:
>> New MINIMAL kernel config
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:51:55AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > [...]
> > +# Pseudo devices.
> > +device loop# Network loopback
> > +device random # Entropy device
> > +device padlock_rng # VIA Padlock RNG
> > +d
On 1/14/15 7:42 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> Author: imp
> Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
> New Revision: 277204
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
>
> Log:
> New MINIMAL kernel config. The goal with this configuration is to
> only compile in those options in GENERIC that cann
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 05:35:41PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 15.01.2015 17:08, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > When you read one big file *once* you don't have to worry about caching
> > reads. With everything moved to modules, loader does a lot of
> > superfluous disk access, and to remedy
On 15.01.2015 17:08, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> reading large monolitic kernel is slow too.
>
> But not nearly as slow as loading 50-60 modules at boot time (on my stable/8
> I have 59 right now). When you read one big file *once* you don't have to
> worry about caching reads. With everything mo
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:53:42PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:44:46PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > intention. AFAIR last time we had a discussion about why our default
> > kernel is not MINIMAL, it boiled down to two main problems: 1) loader's
> > caching o
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:44:46PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:23:03PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > New Revision: 277204
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
> > >
> >
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:23:03PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
> > New Revision: 277204
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
> >
> > Log:
> > New MINIMAL kernel config. The goal with this configuration is to
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
> Author: imp
> Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
> New Revision: 277204
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
>
> Log:
> New MINIMAL kernel config. The goal with this configuration is to
> only compile in those optio
19 matches
Mail list logo
