On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 03:05:41PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> This to me reads like "we need to fix pmc's locking so it's not so
> terrible on multi-multi-core-machines." :)
I am may be wrong, but I don't see in pmc interrupt path.
May be this is need fix too?
> On 26 August 2014 11:54, Slawa
This to me reads like "we need to fix pmc's locking so it's not so
terrible on multi-multi-core-machines." :)
-a
On 26 August 2014 11:54, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:04:25AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> On 20 May 2014 08:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>
>> >> (B
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:35:21PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 26.08.2014 21:54, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:04:25AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> >> On 20 May 2014 08:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >>
> (But if you try it on 10.0 and it changes thing
On 26.08.2014 21:54, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:04:25AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> On 20 May 2014 08:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>
(But if you try it on 10.0 and it changes things, by all means let me
know.)
>>>
>>> I am try on 10.0, but not sure abo
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:04:25AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 20 May 2014 08:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> >> (But if you try it on 10.0 and it changes things, by all means let me
> >> know.)
> >
> > I am try on 10.0, but not sure about significant improvement (may be
> > 10%).
> >
> >
On 20 May 2014, at 16:26 , Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:04:25AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> On 20 May 2014 08:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>
(But if you try it on 10.0 and it changes things, by all means let me
know.)
>>>
>>> I am try on 10.0, but n
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:04:25AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 20 May 2014 08:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> >> (But if you try it on 10.0 and it changes things, by all means let me
> >> know.)
> >
> > I am try on 10.0, but not sure about significant improvement (may be
> > 10%).
> >
> >
On 20 May 2014 08:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>> (But if you try it on 10.0 and it changes things, by all means let me know.)
>
> I am try on 10.0, but not sure about significant improvement (may be
> 10%).
>
> For current CPU (E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz) hwpmc don't working (1. after
> collect some
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 08:32:34AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 11 May 2014 01:31, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:53:37AM +, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> >> Author: adrian
> >> Date: Sat May 10 00:53:36 2014
> >> New Revision: 265792
> >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.o
On 11 May 2014 01:31, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:53:37AM +, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> Author: adrian
>> Date: Sat May 10 00:53:36 2014
>> New Revision: 265792
>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/265792
>>
>> Log:
>> Add in support to optionally pin the
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:53:37AM +, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Author: adrian
> Date: Sat May 10 00:53:36 2014
> New Revision: 265792
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/265792
>
> Log:
> Add in support to optionally pin the swi threads.
>
> Under enough load, the swi's can ac
11 matches
Mail list logo