Re: svn commit: r264794 - head/release/arm

2014-04-22 Thread Warner Losh
On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:15:14PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Glen Barber wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:09:23AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:02:03PM -0700, Warner Losh

Re: svn commit: r264794 - head/release/arm

2014-04-22 Thread Glen Barber
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:15:14PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:09:23AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:02:03PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > >>> Ditto. This should be backed out and you sh

Re: svn commit: r264794 - head/release/arm

2014-04-22 Thread Warner Losh
On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:09:23AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:02:03PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >>> Ditto. This should be backed out and you should make whoever broke this fix >>> it in head. >>> >> >> Well, this

Re: svn commit: r264794 - head/release/arm

2014-04-22 Thread Warner Losh
On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:09 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:02:03PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >> Ditto. This should be backed out and you should make whoever broke this fix >> it in head. >> > > Well, this commit only moves where the definition is, from the script > itself t

Re: svn commit: r264794 - head/release/arm

2014-04-22 Thread Glen Barber
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:09:23AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:02:03PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > Ditto. This should be backed out and you should make whoever broke this fix > > it in head. > > > > Well, this commit only moves where the definition is, from the scrip

Re: svn commit: r264794 - head/release/arm

2014-04-22 Thread Glen Barber
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:02:03PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > Ditto. This should be backed out and you should make whoever broke this fix > it in head. > Well, this commit only moves where the definition is, from the script itself to the configuration file. But, to be fair, I think you broke i

Re: svn commit: r264794 - head/release/arm

2014-04-22 Thread Warner Losh
Ditto. This should be backed out and you should make whoever broke this fix it in head. Warner On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > Author: gjb > Date: Wed Apr 23 02:01:22 2014 > New Revision: 264794 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/264794 > > Log: > Move xdev kno