On Apr 19, 2013, at 06:50, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
>> In any case, the layout has been like this since the initial clangbsd
>> import, and I never saw any reason to change it. Maybe Ed can tell a
>> bit more, since he seems to have done the ini
On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> In any case, the layout has been like this since the initial clangbsd
> import, and I never saw any reason to change it. Maybe Ed can tell a
> bit more, since he seems to have done the initial infrastructure setup.
FreeBSD/ARM just switched f
On 2013-04-17 19:33, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 17:58, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 5:05 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>>> So you compile with -ffreestanding -nostdinc?
>>> And then add the include path returned by -print-file-name=include?
>>
>> That's what the U-Boot s
On Apr 17, 2013, at 17:58, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 5:05 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
...
>> So you compile with -ffreestanding -nostdinc?
>> And then add the include path returned by -print-file-name=include?
>
> That's what the U-Boot sources do, yes.
Why would U-Boot want to bui
On Apr 17, 2013, at 5:05 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 2013-04-17 08:26, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:06 PM, Juli Mallett wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
On Apr 16, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 2013-04-14 21:13, Tim Kient
On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 8:05:31 am Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> In the lang/clang port files/patch-tools_clang_lib_Headers_Makefile
> should be removed I think. It prevents too many useful headers from
> being installed (e.g. avxintrin.h)
I have a local patch to that that I've sent to brooks@ prev
On 2013-04-17 08:26, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:06 PM, Juli Mallett wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-04-14 21:13, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Modified: head/lib/Makefile
>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:06 PM, Juli Mallett wrote:
>> If you're doing a freestanding compile...shouldn't you also be
>> specifying both include and library paths explicitly?
>
> Yes, of course. But the correct directories to use vary somewh
On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:06 PM, Juli Mallett wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-04-14 21:13, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Author: kientzle
Date: Sun Apr 14 19:13:51 2013
New Revision: 249484
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>
>> On 2013-04-14 21:13, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>> Author: kientzle
>>> Date: Sun Apr 14 19:13:51 2013
>>> New Revision: 249484
>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/249484
>>>
>
On Apr 16, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 2013-04-14 21:13, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>> Author: kientzle
>> Date: Sun Apr 14 19:13:51 2013
>> New Revision: 249484
>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/249484
>>
>> Log:
>> Install a symlink
>>/usr/lib/include ==> /usr/inc
On 2013-04-14 21:13, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Author: kientzle
> Date: Sun Apr 14 19:13:51 2013
> New Revision: 249484
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/249484
>
> Log:
> Install a symlink
> /usr/lib/include ==> /usr/include
>
> This fixes -print-file-name=include in clang (a
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 07:13:52PM +, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Install a symlink
> /usr/lib/include ==> /usr/include
April 1st was several weeks ago.
> This fixes -print-file-name=include in clang (and is
> arguably a better way to fix the same issue in GCC than
> the change I mad
Here is the quote from r231336 commit message:
===
commit be984b719cbcb225dc4afaf9f52b38fb882a09d3
Author: kientzle
Date: Fri Feb 10 05:05:42 2012 +
Implement -print-file-name=include (which is undocumented
but used by some Linux boot loaders). This option prints
out the direct
14 matches
Mail list logo