On 15 December 2011 02:15, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> So in short: if you're happy removing it, remove it. :)
>
> I agree on passing the frame as an argument to iac_check() and obtain
> the mac from there, that definitely is required for more advanced
> ACLs. Passing both tough, is imho not requi
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:35, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 15 December 2011 00:02, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Why didn't you remove the mac argument? It is assign from wh->i_addr2
>> anyways, seems rather too redundant to me.
>
> Because the semantics for that right now are "check that MAC", so it
On 15 December 2011 00:02, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Why didn't you remove the mac argument? It is assign from wh->i_addr2
> anyways, seems rather too redundant to me.
Because the semantics for that right now are "check that MAC", so it's
the callers responsibility to determine which MAC in the
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:52, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Author: adrian
> Date: Thu Dec 15 00:52:30 2011
> New Revision: 228514
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228514
>
> Log:
> Modify the ACL code slightly to support a few nifty things:
>
> * Call it before sending probe responses, so
