On Sat, 26 Nov 2011, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:10:47AM -0800, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I don't know if there's a style preference for 0x%lx versus %#lx,
though, or a preference for a different type for the print (uintmax_t,
for example). There is probably a preferenc
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:10:47AM -0800, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> I don't know if there's a style preference for 0x%lx versus %#lx,
> though, or a preference for a different type for the print (uintmax_t,
> for example). There is probably a preference for using u_long rather
> than unsigned long
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 06:13:14PM +, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
>
> On 26 Nov 2011, at 17:48, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >> in138:~% procstat -x 2008
> >> PID COMM AUXV VALUE
> >> 2008 nginxAT_PHDR 0x400040
> >> 2008 nginxA
On 26 Nov 2011, at 17:48, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> in138:~% procstat -x 2008
>> PID COMM AUXV VALUE
>> 2008 nginxAT_PHDR 0x400040
>> 2008 nginxAT_PHENT 56
>> 2008 nginxAT_PHNUM 8
>> 2008 nginx
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 06:43:01PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:12:35 +0200 Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> MG> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:10:47 -0800 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
> >>> printf(" AT_IGNORE=0x%lu",
> >>> - (unsigned l
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:12:35 +0200 Mikolaj Golub wrote:
MG> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:10:47 -0800 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>> printf(" AT_IGNORE=0x%lu",
>>> - (unsigned long)aux->a_un.a_val);
>>> + (unsigned long)auxv[i]
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:10:47 -0800 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> printf(" AT_IGNORE=0x%lu",
>> - (unsigned long)aux->a_un.a_val);
>> + (unsigned long)auxv[i].a_un.a_val);
m> I didn't see this before, but this gives very
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> Author: trociny
> Date: Wed Nov 23 07:34:09 2011
> New Revision: 227873
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227873
>
> Log:
> Fix build, hopefully.
>
> Reviewed by: kib
>
> Modified:
> head/usr.bin/procstat/procstat_auxv.c
>
> M
