On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Roman Divacky wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 07:16:12PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
However2, the system ALIGN() on
amd64 doesn't know the correct alignment either (both essentially had
64 bits hard-coded). Now xlint uses a different hard-coded alignment
(128 bits).
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 07:16:12PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Roman Divacky wrote:
>
> >Log:
> > Rename the ALIGN macro to LINT_ALIGN so it does not clash with
> > machine/param.h
> >
> > Bump the alignment to 16bytes because lint1 memory allocator is used for
> > objects tha
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Roman Divacky wrote:
Log:
Rename the ALIGN macro to LINT_ALIGN so it does not clash with machine/param.h
Bump the alignment to 16bytes because lint1 memory allocator is used for
objects that require 16bytes alignment on amd64 (ie. val_t). This makes
lint1 work when compi