On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:31:52PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > Author: yongari
> > Date: Fri Mar 12 18:18:04 2010
> > New Revision: 205090
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205090
> >
> > Log:
> > Reorder interrupt handler a bit s
On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> Author: yongari
> Date: Fri Mar 12 18:18:04 2010
> New Revision: 205090
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205090
>
> Log:
> Reorder interrupt handler a bit such that producer/consumer
> index of status block is read first before ackn
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 03:47:29AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:05:11PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >>On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >>
> >>>Log:
> >>>Reorder interrupt handler a bit such that producer/consumer
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:05:11PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
Log:
Reorder interrupt handler a bit such that producer/consumer
index of status block is read first before acknowledging the
interrupts. Otherwis
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:05:11PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
> >Log:
> > Reorder interrupt handler a bit such that producer/consumer
> > index of status block is read first before acknowledging the
> > interrupts. Otherwise bge(4) may get stale status
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
Log:
Reorder interrupt handler a bit such that producer/consumer
index of status block is read first before acknowledging the
interrupts. Otherwise bge(4) may get stale status block as
acknowledging an interrupt may yield another status block update