On Oct 1, 2009, at 5:06 AM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Marcel Moolenaar (xcl...@mac.com) wrote:
Seconded. I've seen a report of geom_part_ebr unable to detect
partitions which were actually there. Will inquiry the reporter if
this change solved the problem.
Seems like it hasn't. Here's the f
* Marcel Moolenaar (xcl...@mac.com) wrote:
> >> Seconded. I've seen a report of geom_part_ebr unable to detect
> >> partitions which were actually there. Will inquiry the reporter if
> >> this change solved the problem.
> >
> > Seems like it hasn't. Here's the first sector from that partition:
>
On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
Seconded. I've seen a report of geom_part_ebr unable to detect
partitions which were actually there. Will inquiry the reporter if
this change solved the problem.
Seems like it hasn't. Here's th
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
> Seconded. I've seen a report of geom_part_ebr unable to detect
> partitions which were actually there. Will inquiry the reporter if
> this change solved the problem.
Seems like it hasn't. Here's the first sector from that partition:
000 48eb 009
In message:
Marcel Moolenaar writes:
:
: On Sep 29, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
:
: >
: > On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
: >
: >>> Why do you check for zeros at all? AFAIK, the only real check is
: >>> for AA55 at the end of the sector (and having an MBR
In message:
Robert Watson writes:
:
: On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
:
: >> Why do you check for zeros at all? AFAIK, the only real check is for AA55
: >> at the end of the sector (and having an MBR or other Extended MBR
partition
: >> entry point at the sector in
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 12:18:11 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:49 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Monday 28 September 2009 7:52:47 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >> Author: marcel
> >> Date: Mon Sep 28 23:52:47 2009
> >> New Revision: 197608
> >> URL: http://svn.freebsd
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
We really need to get to a point where we treat partition types
seriously and
use it to help avoid false positives. Reducing or eliminating false
positives
is critical if we ever want to go towards DWIM or auto-mounting. With the
partition type taken into consideration
On Sep 29, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Why do you check for zeros at all? AFAIK, the only real check is
for AA55 at the end of the sector (and having an MBR or other
Extended MBR partition entry point at the sector in question).
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Why do you check for zeros at all? AFAIK, the only real check is for AA55
at the end of the sector (and having an MBR or other Extended MBR partition
entry point at the sector in question). The '96' thing seems rather
arbitrary in the code, and I
On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:49 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday 28 September 2009 7:52:47 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Author: marcel
Date: Mon Sep 28 23:52:47 2009
New Revision: 197608
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/197608
Log:
The first 96 bytes may not be zeroes. It can contain trivi
* John Baldwin (j...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> Why do you check for zeros at all? AFAIK, the only real check is for AA55 at
> the end of the sector (and having an MBR or other Extended MBR partition
> entry point at the sector in question). The '96' thing seems rather
> arbitrary in the code, and
On Monday 28 September 2009 7:52:47 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Author: marcel
> Date: Mon Sep 28 23:52:47 2009
> New Revision: 197608
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/197608
>
> Log:
> The first 96 bytes may not be zeroes. It can contain trivial boot
> code that merely emits an e
13 matches
Mail list logo
