On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:47:53AM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Brooks Davis (bro...@freebsd.org) wrote:
>
> So, any comments on this? Should I submit the PR?
Please do submit a pr. I think we should actually change the link check
for a check if there are dhcp interfaces marked up and add
* Brooks Davis (bro...@freebsd.org) wrote:
So, any comments on this? Should I submit the PR?
--
Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru
___
svn-sr
* Brooks Davis (bro...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> > I use ale(4). Will test some more. Couldn't the fact that the interface
> > is renamed be the reason?
>
> Shouldn't be. I use renamed interfaces a fair bit. The ale(4) driver
> uses mii, but so lack of link events shouldn't be an issue unless the
>
In message: <20090410.123404.-1398308997@bsdimp.com>
"M. Warner Losh" writes:
: In message: <20090409153805.gb83...@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
: Brooks Davis writes:
: : Unless you have one of the few interfaces that does not generate
: : link status events, dhclient will
In message: <20090410184337.ga6...@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
Brooks Davis writes:
: On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:34:04PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20090409153805.gb83...@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
: > Brooks Davis writes:
: > : Unless you have one of the few i
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:34:04PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20090409153805.gb83...@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
> Brooks Davis writes:
> : Unless you have one of the few interfaces that does not generate
> : link status events, dhclient will be started by devd. The only
In message: <20090409153805.gb83...@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
Brooks Davis writes:
: Unless you have one of the few interfaces that does not generate
: link status events, dhclient will be started by devd. The only ones I
: know of are a subset set of ed(4) devices, though I think imp m
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 07:51:38PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Brooks Davis (bro...@freebsd.org) wrote:
>
> > > Shouldn't synchronous_dhclient be ON by default then? The way it
> > > is, DHCP is not used at all, I ended up with unreachable box which
> > > didn't get any IP already.
> >
> >
* Brooks Davis (bro...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> > Shouldn't synchronous_dhclient be ON by default then? The way it
> > is, DHCP is not used at all, I ended up with unreachable box which
> > didn't get any IP already.
>
> Unless you have one of the few interfaces that does not generate
> link status
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:12:53PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Dag-Erling Smorgrav (d...@freebsd.org) wrote:
>
> > Modified: head/etc/defaults/rc.conf
> > ==
> > --- head/etc/defaults/rc.conf Thu Mar 19 12:39:
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav (d...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> Modified: head/etc/defaults/rc.conf
> ==
> --- head/etc/defaults/rc.conf Thu Mar 19 12:39:13 2009(r190030)
> +++ head/etc/defaults/rc.conf Thu Mar 19 12:48:00 2009
11 matches
Mail list logo
