[Sursound] Universal Ambisonic 0.98

2010-11-23 Thread e deleflie
As the dust settles, I think it is clear that UA should look more like what it is slowly morphing into. Spec attached, summary below. Comments and suggestions welcome. Normalisation scheme: N3D Supported orders: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th Component sequence: Gerzon Ambisonic Supported mixed orders: full p

Re: [Sursound] Universal Ambisonic 0.98

2010-11-24 Thread e deleflie
Hi Trond, > I don't feel qualified to respond to the decisions inherent in the proposal, > but in terms of the layout of the document itself, I would like to suggest a > few improvements that might render it more readable and self-contained, in > particular helping readers/developers with limit

[Sursound] UA 0.982 [was Re: Universal Ambisonic 0.98]

2010-11-24 Thread e deleflie
> Hmmm. The column heading says 'conversion to B-format/FMH', > and the values are prefixed by an 'x'. This suggests that > to get FMH you have to multiply the N3D component by the > value listed. thanks for picking that up... I think it is more likely, in the future, that B-format will be convert

Re: [Sursound] Oh while I am asking

2010-11-25 Thread e deleflie
> I have found a variety of plugins to manipulate the soundfield as well as > localize a mono/stereo source, but I haven't been able to find a plugin that > will just play a B-Format .amb file > Does one exist and how can I get one please ?! Rapture3D will do it ... http://www.blueripplesound

Re: [Sursound] UA 0.982 [was Re: Universal Ambisonic 0.98]

2010-11-25 Thread e deleflie
>> > Hmmm. The column heading says 'conversion to B-format/FMH', >> > and the values are prefixed by an 'x'. This suggests that >> > to get FMH you have to multiply the N3D component by the >> > value listed. >> >> thanks for picking that up... I think it is more likely, in the >> future, that B-fo

Re: [Sursound] UA 0.982 [was Re: Universal Ambisonic 0.98]

2010-11-25 Thread e deleflie
> and list the required 'g' values for the signal sets you support. that's what I've done, but I havn't made a distinction between peri and hori > OTOH, the main consideration for choosing ACN was that these things > will in most cases be handled by tools and code rather than by humans. I have f

Re: [Sursound] UA 0.982 [was Re: Universal Ambisonic 0.98]

2010-11-27 Thread e deleflie
>> I think the most confusing thing is for the channel names to have an >> implied order. FuMa implies the order of the alphabet, but this order >> is wrong. And ANC implies its numerical order. It would be strange to >> have ACN channel 3 in position 2. > > It is confusing if the implied order is

Re: [Sursound] UA 0.982 [was Re: Universal Ambisonic 0.98]

2010-11-27 Thread e deleflie
>>> Can you convince me to use the ACN scheme? > > it is very well documented on michael chapman's site. does the channel order have support elsewhere? Etienne > http://ambisonics.ch/standards/channels/ > > very big plus :) > > > -- > Jörn Nettingsmeier > Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 1

Re: [Sursound] cross-talk cancellation used in binaural sound

2011-03-01 Thread e deleflie
>> Unfortunately ambisonia.com seems to be unobtainium.  I know this has been >> asked before but is ambisonia.com archived anywhere and will it be available >> again? ambisonia.com is down permanently. Apologies for any inconvenience. There is a chance that Paul Hodges might host some of Ambisoni

Re: [Sursound] Death of Ambisonia.com

2011-03-07 Thread e deleflie
:35:45 +1100 >> From: e deleflie >> Subject: Re: [Sursound] cross-talk cancellation used in binaural sound > >> ambisonia.com is down permanently. Apologies for any inconvenience. >> There is a chance that Paul Hodges might host some of Ambisonia's >> content on h

Re: [Sursound] Death of Ambisonia.com

2011-03-08 Thread e deleflie
more > chaotic year than > usual). Although I now have draft permissions for this, we need to sort > out what happens when I > retire, which is now just 18 months away (hooray!) otherwise ambisonia could > be in the same state > after that > >           Dave >

Re: [Sursound] Death of Ambisonia.com

2011-03-09 Thread e deleflie
ia.com >> > >> > I must apologise to Etienne (and everyone else) - I had indicated >> > to him that we at York would be interested in taking this on but >> > for a number of reasons getting permission at this end has dragged >> > on much longer than is go

Re: [Sursound] Death of Ambisonia.com

2011-03-10 Thread e deleflie
thanks for your kind words Richard. Ambisonia.com only became what it was due to the generousity of those sharing their great work ... Paul Hodges, John Leonard, Jean-Hugues Roy, Henry, AJH ... I'm disappointed that I can not continue the effort. It has made me realise the importance of business.

Re: [Sursound] Death of Ambisonia.com

2011-03-10 Thread e deleflie
e > (or other formats) on a Linux server using the command line version of > ambdec. Scripts could be integrated in the workflow of the (yet to be > revived) Ambisonia web site;  Plone have all the bell and whistles to > handle simple and complex workflows. > > Le mars 9, 2011, M

Re: [Sursound] Death of Ambisonia.com

2011-03-10 Thread e deleflie
>> DTS [...] can be burned to CD audio and performs >> like a normal CD if the player is ignorant of DTS. > > Er, no.  Burned to CD, yes, but if the player (or a decoder at the other end > of a digital link) doesn't know about DTS, then you just get whitish noise. ah, ok, I always thought it was l