As an example, Dolby Atmos technology was used to master and render a
recording of Ice Field by Harry Brant, a spatial orchestral composition:
https://www.sfsymphony.org/brant
Unfortunately I can't download or stream the full album (rendered in
binaural stereo) because it doesn't seem to be av
Oops! I meant Henry Brant (not Harry Brant)...
Le 29/05/2019 à 11:11, Marc Lavallée a écrit :
As an example, Dolby Atmos technology was used to master and render a
recording of Ice Field by Harry Brant, a spatial orchestral composition:
https://www.sfsymphony.org/brant
Unfortunately I can't d
On 28/05/2019 19:47, Marc Lavallée wrote:
Le 28/05/2019 à 13:48, mgraves mstvp.com a écrit :
The latency is not only caused by the packetization; the transmission
chain looks like:
(microphone -> ADC -> encoding -> BT transmission) -> (BT reception ->
decoding) -> (SIP + encoding -> IP
Agreed. Most of what I think of as the "local signal processing" is quite
speedy. Packetization delay is never less than 20 ms. Transmission delay
dependent upon the network and distance. Poorly designed network elements lead
to buffer bloat, which increases latency dramatically.
The very lates
___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
> edit account or options, view archives and so on.
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190529/54bacb40/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
At 17:41 29-05-19, you wrote:
Most of what I think of as the "local signal processing" is quite
speedy. Packetization delay is never less than 20 ms. Transmission
delay dependent upon the network and distance. Poorly designed
network elements lead to buffer bloat, which increases latency drama
Yes, my concern is for live/real-time situations. No post-prod.
Michael Graves
mgra...@mstvp.com
http://www.mgraves.org
o(713) 861-4005
c(713) 201-1262
sip:mgra...@mjg.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
-Original Message-
From: Sursound On Behalf Of David Pickett
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 2:22
--On 29 May 2019 19:53 + "mgraves mstvp.com"
wrote:
> But for a signal sent by such a link, latency hardly matters if the
> signal is to be mixed later with other microphones (perhaps the
> ambisonic mic) that are fed directly, as the tracks can easily be
> aligned in the DAW!
This discussio
ilman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
> edit account or options, view archives and so on.
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190529/9cb58a90/attachment.html>
At 22:52 29-05-19, you wrote:
Distribution to speakers using UDP multicast of a multichannel stream could
possibly make the only time difference between channels be eventual
receiver buffering.
Just speculation...
Bo-Erik
But the question is whether it would be a fixed value and
predictabl
10 matches
Mail list logo
