>
>>
One of the presenters on the BBC's World Service's technology programme
"Click" just came out with words to the effect 'It's not 360 degrees, it's
four pi steradians' during a discussionof a (not) 360 degree video of the
construction of London's Crossrail.
Daring departure from dumbing down
A 01.11.2016 21:58, Stefan Schreiber escrigué:
Sebastià V. Amengual wrote:
I could be wrong, but as I understand, as far as the distance between
the microphones is much smaller than
the wavelength, it is possible to obtain first-order microphones with
any kind of directional pattern. Thus,
at
Fosterandpertners.com ?
For extra-pert audio solutions? ☺
jon
On 01/11/2016, 15:20, "Sursound on behalf of Philip Robinson"
wrote:
Dear group,
A position for an auralization specialist is coming available in my
research group. In addition to developing new auralization system
No idea what this “this sender failed our fraud detection….” Thing is about?
jon
On 02/11/2016, 10:32, "Sursound on behalf of Jon Honeyball"
wrote:
This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they
appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing
>> Sebastià V. Amengual wrote:
>
> That was one of the main cons. With the four distances that I used in my
> measurements (10.44mm, 23.49mm, 48.34mm, 98.35mm)
> if we wanted to cover the whole frequency range, we needed at least 3
> microphones with different spacing, and then the
> signals could
Michael Chapman wrote:
Sebastià V. Amengual wrote:
That was one of the main cons. With the four distances that I used in my
measurements (10.44mm, 23.49mm, 48.34mm, 98.35mm)
if we wanted to cover the whole frequency range, we needed at least 3
microphones with different spacing, and then
--- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20161102/cb27283f/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.e
