Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics on the web pt.1: Web Audio FOA/HOA ambisonic objects

2016-06-22 Thread Politis Archontis
ite do not do justice to the EM potential! Best regards, Archontis Politis -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160622/d108394e/attachment.html> _

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics on the web pt.1: Web Audio FOA/HOA ambisonic objects

2016-06-22 Thread Politis Archontis
ds, Archontis Politis -- next part ------ An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160622/f94be3f4/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics on the web pt.1: Web Audio FOA/HOA ambisonic objects

2016-06-22 Thread Politis Archontis
Hi Albert, > > Most of the first order samples reproduce nothing above 10k and a lot of > them sound severely saturated/clipped. I re-normalized the decoding filters in the examples, could you confirm if that fixes the clipping issues you mentioned on your browser? Best regards, Archontis _

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics on the web pt.1: Web Audio FOA/HOA ambisonic objects

2016-06-22 Thread Steven Backer
e speakers. > >>> The eigenmike could be a nice tool for VR/AR recordings >> Absolutely! We think so, too. >> We’ve actually been pretty busy recently making quite a few recordings (some >> with video!), and have some great material we are going to share publicly