> No reason specifically,
> I always thought that most people associate B-format with the traditional
> 1st-order specification, and maybe the FuMa definition up to 3rd-order. I
> wasn’t sure if that’s the common term for general HOA signals.
>
> So, you think something like HOA B-format is better
Hi Albert,
Thanks for the feedback!
> On 21 Jun 2016, at 07:38, Albert Leusink wrote:
>
> Well done Archontis!. I was hoping this could be possible, somebody just had
> to put the work into it...thanks so much for this.
>
> The examples are (sort of) working for me but sound very low res and
d leave to people to pick the term they prefer. In the end they all descrbe
the same thing..
BR,
Archontis
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160621/31f01808/attachment.html>
Politis Archontis wrote:
In a sense the Eigenmike provides a much better first-order B-format.
Only in a directional sense, and not that much IMO. (vs. "much better")
Using proper encoding filters the range of the dipoles and omni are close to
the ideal ones for up to ~9kHz, for the Sou
Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Exactly. An SF mike records over the complete musical spectrum. The
Eigenmike tries to (via signal processing/HF correction) but doesn't
do yet?
Just to be a bit more clear:
An Eigenmike has some aliasing limit frequency, if I remember well at
about 7.5 kHz. (I al
edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160621/67ae4465/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
