Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread Dave Malham
__ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > > The University of Derby has a published policy regarding email and > reser

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread Eero Aro
David Pickett wrote: Somebody else said that he has encountered people who have difficulties with stereo. I said that I have met during the three decades or so, students who perceive a stereo image reproduced by two loudpeakers in different ways. Most people seem to integrate a stereo sound im

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread David Pickett
At 11:54 30-03-16, Eero Aro wrote: If 90 degrees between the speakers works for you, fine. Most likely the commercial recordings you are listening to, have been monitored with an 60 degrees angle, as that has been the "standard" setup in studios for more than 60 years. It didn't happen when 5.

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread Peter Lennox
At the back of my mind, the4re's something nagging me - I'm sure I've read of someone advocating 3 speaker stereo (is that similar to trifield?) and finding that a wider spacing of LR speakers was desirable? - makes sense. Dr. Peter Lennox Senior Lecturer in Perception College of Arts University

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread David Pickett
At 14:27 30-03-16, Peter Lennox wrote: > >At the back of my mind, the4re's something nagging me - I'm sure I've >read of someone advocating 3 speaker stereo (is that similar to >trifield?) and finding that a wider spacing of LR speakers was >desirable? - makes sense. Michael Gerzon, "Three Channe

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width

2016-03-30 Thread Eero Aro
Peter Lennox wrote: At the back of my mind, the4re's something nagging me - I'm sure I've read of someone advocating 3 speaker stereo (is that similar to trifield?) and finding that a wider spacing of LR speakers was desirable? - makes sense. Well, Harvey Fletcher and the Bell Labs team started

[Sursound] Decay times and frequency response for control rooms/studios

2016-03-30 Thread Augustine Leudar
umber : NI635217 Registered 63 Ballycoan rd, Belfast BT88LL -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160330/48df6efd/attachment.html> ___ Surso

Re: [Sursound] Decay times and frequency response for control rooms/studios

2016-03-30 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 03/30/2016 03:49 PM, Augustine Leudar wrote: Can anyone point me to any kind of standard (BBC/AES etc) for control room room/equipment responses as a whole transfer function. Id like to know what decay times are acceptable. I read somewhere that , within reason, how dead or live a room is no

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width

2016-03-30 Thread Newmedia
___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160330/dd01f695/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread Richard
The interesting case here is panned sources between the speakers; where 'equal power" implies the sound follows an arc of a circle centred on the listener (constant distance = constant power etc). However, the intuitive/vernacular understanding of panning is a linear path between the speakers -

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width

2016-03-30 Thread Peter Lennox
recordings in the 50's. Maybe someone knows if they were released on reel-to-reel tapes as three-channel? These recordings have been re-released on SACD. Eero ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width

2016-03-30 Thread Newmedia
Stereo released three channel stereo recordings in the 50's. Maybe someone knows if they were released on reel-to-reel tapes as three-channel? These recordings have been re-released on SACD. Eero ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.v

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width

2016-03-30 Thread David Pickett
At 17:10 30-03-16, Peter Lennox wrote: >Alan Blumlein at the EMI started with 30...35 degrees stereo stage >with two loudspeakers. Remember, he was thinking about "binaural" not >stereo sound. What Blumlein called "binaural" was not what we call "binaural", using headphones -- it was his name

Re: [Sursound] Soundfield MK IV Disassembly

2016-03-30 Thread Rudy Chalupa
.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160330/5d6e5442/attachment.html> -- next part --

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width

2016-03-30 Thread jim moses
music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- Jim Moses Technical Director/Lecturer Brown University Music Department and M.E.M.E. (Multimedia and Electronic Music Experiments) -

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width

2016-03-30 Thread Dave Malham
t part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160330/b761dcd1/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread Eric Benjamin
music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on. ------ next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160330/3fc96128/attac

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread Eero Aro
Thank you Eric. That sums it great up, and you give the sources of the researches. Finally some facts to the table. Some of those papers are in the Motherlode, but by which names? Eero 30.3.2016, 21:44, Eric Benjamin kirjoitti: There are several classic papers on 2-channel stereo reproduc

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread David Pickett
At 20:44 30-03-16, Eric Benjamin wrote: >I have two observations from my own research. The first is that the >ear signals resulting from equal signals at the loudspeakers is not >the same as for a real source located between the loudspeakers. The >second is that, if I measure the ear signals for

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread Peter Lennox
Nice collected resource! I'd add Gunther Theile's thesis " on the localisation in the superimposed sound field: http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://hauptmikrofon.de/theile/1980-2_Diss._Theile_englisch.pdf&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwj_nK39lunLAhVMORoKHdT9AEcQFggeMAI&usg=AFQjCNH6nNtd5_yKnXJRQLeBwHJ8M3kEVw In

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread Bo-Erik Sandholm
l were you using when you made these observations, please? > > David -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160330/d39a5913/attachment.html>

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread Stefan Schreiber
David Pickett wrote: At 14:27 30-03-16, Peter Lennox wrote: > >At the back of my mind, the4re's something nagging me - I'm sure I've >read of someone advocating 3 speaker stereo (is that similar to >trifield?) and finding that a wider spacing of LR speakers was >desirable? - makes sense. Michae

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread Stefan Schreiber
David Pickett wrote: Michael Gerzon, "Three Channels. The Future of Stereo?", Studio Sound, vol. 32 no. 6, pp. 112, 114, 117, 118, 120, 123 & 125 (1990 June) (An account of Ambisonic ideas applied to 3-speaker frontal stereo.) http://www.audiosignal.co.uk/Resources/Three_channels_A4.pdf

Re: [Sursound] OT Stereo stage width - Was: Static stereo source in rotating soundfield, possible?

2016-03-30 Thread Aaron Heller
ns, view archives and so on. >> >> > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archi