Actually, dissenting voices apart, I can see how one might want some items in a
sound field to be localisable, and some not. If this is actually what is wanted
here - and taking into account one might want a particular component to be
'everywhere and nowhere' - but not inside the head - then a d
ut quite easy to implement.
David
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160329/e82cf2f4/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursou
ld, possible?
>
>
> The problem with speakers at +/- 45 degrees is that one needs a
> wide room if one is to sit at a decent distance from them.
> However, it can be impressive. I have found the effect even better
> if a centre speaker of the same typeis added. Gerzon gave the
>
Thanks for your comment Dave.
For info, the intro price ends in three days (59 instead of 99 euros).
Feedback and feature requests are welcome for the next releases.
Best regards,
Charles
www.noisemakers.fr
On 13 mars 2016, at 13:36, Dave Hunt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I listened to this using Max/MS
At 20:51 29-03-16, Peter Lennox wrote:
>wasn't the original conception for stereo = 90 degrees, but 'hole in
>the middle' effects led to standardising on the narrower figure?
There seemd to be an echo in here!
Running down the email and deleting as I go, I come to:
>> From: David Pickett
>> Da
W. Vanowen Place
Burbank, CA 91505
323-874-1000
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160329/fd9b5b8c/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing
> I have a question for the keepers of ancient wisdom: how does one remove
the capsule assembly from a Soundfield MK IV microphone? I have one on
which the 1 kilohm "capsule heater" resistor has gone open circuit. The
cone on the MK V and newer is split and comes apart pretty readily, but the
M
