Re: [Sursound] vertical precendence and summing localisation (wallis and lee 2015)

2015-12-12 Thread Dave Malham
> > > Tonmeister VDT > > > > > > > > http://stackingdwarves.net > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > Sursound mailing list > > > > Sursound@music.

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-12 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:55:36AM +, Stefan Schreiber wrote: But your plots surely don't apply directly to the Ozo sphere, which is packed with electronics inside? (s. Nokia's videos.) The word "case" includes the interior of the sphere, which is not hollow. Your

Re: [Sursound] vertical precendence and summing localisation (wallis and lee 2015)

2015-12-12 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Bo-Erik Sandholm wrote: I just want to say that when I read Joseph's mail I feel like christmas has come early this year :-) I have been thinking about headtracked binaural listening for a couple of years and discussing it here and in other forums. The goal is to make it possible to listen to

Re: [Sursound] vertical precendence and summing localisation (wallis and lee 2015)

2015-12-12 Thread Eero Aro
Hi All Sorry that I haven't been reading this thread too carefully and may have missed the point, whether the discussion is about headphone or speaker listening. Sometimes I have a bad habit just to dump posts. However, here's the LEDR test for loudspeaker listening. It is intended for quick ste

Re: [Sursound] vertical precendence and summing localisation (wallis and lee 2015)

2015-12-12 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Bo-Erik Sandholm wrote: Sadly this info is not published as far as I know, I have it from Ingvar Öhman http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ingvar+%C3%B6hman&l=1 who had a research company for researching how the human hearing work together with the 2 loudspeaker stereo system. He did a demo recording showin

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-12 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 08:01:35PM +, Stefan Schreiber wrote: > Your sphere plot applies (for example) to the Eigenmike, which is > based on 32 capsules positioned directly on the sphere surface. > > Ozo: The tiny openings you can see on the pictures seem to be just > that. (So, no capsules..

Re: [Sursound] vertical precedence and summing localisation (wallis and lee 2015)

2015-12-12 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Peter Lennox wrote: Of course, the paradigm that excludes head-tilt - necessary to control for experimental variables, does mean that the experiment is not representative (what some people refer to as 'ecological validity') of real-world localisation. Given that, when I look around the lec

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-12 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 08:01:35PM +, Stefan Schreiber wrote: Your sphere plot applies (for example) to the Eigenmike, which is based on 32 capsules positioned directly on the sphere surface. Ozo: The tiny openings you can see on the pictures seem to be just that

Re: [Sursound] vertical precedence and summing localisation (wallis and lee 2015)

2015-12-12 Thread Augustine Leudar
sound source could be a natural > reaction. Biological behaviour pattern?) > > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view arc

Re: [Sursound] vertical precedence and summing localisation (wallis and lee 2015)

2015-12-12 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Augustine Leudar wrote: I think when you tilt your head - especially up - it allows interaural level and time differences to come into play that arent normally available for vertical soundsources. Basically the sound will hit one ear before the other and louder. We all know thats the case for ho