nly $350.
Does anyone have experience with these speakers, or have advice for my
situation?
thanks,
Charles
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20151014/902db5
--- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20151014/902db591/attachment.html
> >
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
ome concerns about the Genelec 8010s selling at only
> $350.
> >
> > Does anyone have experience with these speakers, or have advice for my
> > situation?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Charles
> > -- next pa
Hi
My current speakers are Genelec 8040's. The sub is 7050B, although it isn't
intended to be used with the 8040:s. I use a designated cross-over for
the sub.
The 8040 goes down to 48 Hz, so the sub actually only takes care of the
first two octaves.
The stereo imaging is very good. I have also
ience with these speakers, or have advice for my
>> situation?
>>
>> thanks,
>> Charles
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20151014/902db591/
010s selling at only $350.
>>
>> Does anyone have experience with these speakers, or have advice for my
>> situation?
>>
>> thanks,
>> Charles
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>&g
hinking about (32) Genelec 8010 and (2) Genelec 7050B subs.
> > >
> > > However, I have some concerns about the Genelec 8010s selling at only
> > $350.
> > >
> > > Does anyone have experience with these speakers, or have advi
Genelec 8010 and (2) Genelec 7050B subs.
>> > >
>> > > However, I have some concerns about the Genelec 8010s selling at only
>> > $350.
>> > >
>> > > Does anyone have experience with these speakers, or have advice for my
>> > > situation?
&
At 19:51 14-10-15, Charles Veasey wrote:
>Also, for the computer interface, I'm thinking about RME's HDSPe
>RayDAT and M-32
>DA / M-16 DA
I can say from experience that RME interfaces are first class. They
meet their specs, are reliable, and you can easily get directly in
touch with the compa
nt was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20151014/c53aa382/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
s://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
>> edit account or options, view archives and so on.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> www.augustineleudar.com
>
--
www.augustineleudar.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
On 10/14/2015 07:51 PM, Charles Veasey wrote:
Yes, those are too expensive given the spatial resolution I'd like. My
budget is ~$30-40k.
If the 8010s seem too weak, then maybe something like the Genelec 8030B or
Meyer MM-4XPD.
I have been unimpressed by the passive Meyer MM4s, plus the single
rt --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20151014/f7d259d5/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/s
t part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20151014/f7d259d5/attachment.html
> >
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
At 23:17 14-10-15, Augustine Leudar wrote:
>Yeah actually the lsr308 and lsr305 have been getting rave reviews and cost
>very little their waveguide gives wide dispersal (good off axis response)
>which is probably good for spatial audio.
Good off axis response, i.e. uncoloured response, is presu
15 matches
Mail list logo
