The strict answer to your question is in Gerzon's
"The Design of Precisely Coincident Microphone Arrays for Stereo and
Surround Sound"
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=2466
There's a corrected copy at
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/SoundfieldMic/files/Ricardo/. You
might have to
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:24:10PM -, Richard Lee wrote:
> Aaron Heller & Fons Adrieansen are your best bets.
>
> You need to know the polar directivity patterns of your 16 microphones and
> their 'exact' postion.
Yep, directivity and exact positions. That would allow to compute a
convolu
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:24:10PM -, Richard Lee wrote:
Aaron Heller & Fons Adrieansen are your best bets.
You need to know the polar directivity patterns of your 16 microphones and
their 'exact' postion.
Yep, directivity and exact positions. That would
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:56:42PM +0100, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
> It's still a dreadful mike, after using plenty of ressources to
> "design" a non-optimized WXY mike.
Yes, the positions of the mics are really suboptimal to
put it mildly. Many of them will just produce redundant
information.
>
>> It's still a dreadful mike, after using plenty of ressources to
>> "design" a non-optimized WXY mike.
>
> Yes, the positions of the mics are really suboptimal to
> put it mildly. Many of them will just produce redundant
> information.
>
>> Maybe it is only me, but what was/is the < motivation
