The University of York
York YO10 5DD
UK
'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20140805/d6cb70e1/attachment.html>
__
--On 05 August 2014 12:09 +0100 Dave Malham
wrote:
> I suspect that processing the B format after conversion from A would
> be the best - anyone else have any thoughts?
I have used RX on two-channel pairs of the B-format, with no obvious
breaking of the reconstruction.
Last time I had a noise p
and may or may not be shared by the University
>
> Dave Malham
> Honorary Fellow, Department of Music
> The University of York
> York YO10 5DD
> UK
>
> 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'
> -- next part --
> An HTM
ctober 2012, I have retired from the University.
>
> These are my own views and may or may not be shared by the University
>
> Dave Malham
> Honorary Fellow, Department of Music
> The University of York
> York YO10 5DD
> UK
>
> 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging fo
At 20:56 05-08-14, Joseph Anderson wrote:
>I'd advise converting from B-format to A-format, then doing all
>de-noising, compression, etc, in A-format. Followed by, re-encoding
>back to B-format.
What's the theory that predicts that the results will be any
different than doing it on B-format, gi
