t's slowing the advancement? Can we expect let's say IMAX
Ambisonic surround? I would really like to hear some professional and personal
opinions.
Best regards,
Ivan Vican
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailma
Ivan Vican:
does Ambisonic have a commercial future and why?
I would say that it is a waste of time and energy to try to get
Ambisonics as a distribution medium.
Ambisonics has and will have use in production and processing tools.
Microphones, mixing, effects etc.
The end user at home or in a
iling list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/**mailman/listinfo/sursound<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound>
>
--
07580951119
augustine.leudar.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scru
chment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130515/eca0cdeb/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
spatialisation
techniques and then render your multichannel audio tracks.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130515/eca0cdeb/attachment.html>
___
t;> sources
>> - ideally I would use an individual speaker in the right position as the
>> point source, and failing that some sort of amplitude panning . I would
>> use
>> it for panning sometimes - and for some weird phase effects and a few
>> other
>> things
Well, most of Ambisonics is in the public domain now, so what we mean by
a "commercial future" is not what we might once have hoped it would be.
A future *in* commercial products? Certainly, now and in the future. A
commercial future as itself? Probably not.
Today the technology is probably mo
und/attachments/20130515/948b9273/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Augustine Leudar wrote:
if I want a sound to come from a point source I would not use
ambisonics- I would try and have the sound come out of only one speaker use
Augustine, I don't see anyone objecting you. :-)
I definitely agree with you. I have pointed out the same thing several times
during
- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3475 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130515/701d6510/attachment.bin>
___
Harpex-B works with ProTools, sort-of...
Regards,
John
On 15 May 2013, at 16:28, Richard G Elen wrote:
> Currently that use is limited in mainstream music because there is no series
> of plug-ins for Pro Tools.
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@m
A can be the 2.0Pro and 3.0Ultra
package.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4853 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130515/2a69390a/attachment.bi
On 15/05/2013 20:21, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
1st order could stand a chance, because it can be intuitively understood, and
once demystified and reasonably wide-spread, HOA can be the 2.0Pro and 3.0Ultra
package.
Couldn't agree more.
-_R
___
Surso
13 matches
Mail list logo
