On 02/20/2013 09:20 PM, Eric Carmichel wrote:
Greetings to All:
The system is comprised of 16 channels. The advantage of 16 (or less)
channels is that I don’t have to use a dedicated Word Clock to sync
my MOTU FireWire interfaces. I’m fond of these interfaces, and two of
them can sync-up via the
>>
>> The system is comprised of 16 channels. The advantage of 16 (or less)
>> channels is that I don’t have to use a dedicated Word Clock to sync
>> my MOTU FireWire interfaces. I’m fond of these interfaces, and two of
>> them can sync-up via the FireWire link without complication.
>
> i don't kn
Eric Carmichel wrote:
...
> Eight speakers is
> probably overkill and doesn?t leave me the four channels needed for a square
> array of subs.
If you have four subs then you might want to
consider arranging them in a tetrahedron.
Note that subs are heavy, so there is a
practical problem with mounti
Eric Carmichel wrote:
...
> I intend to use two
> hexagonal arrays of small-sized loudspeakers (a bit larger than the 3-inch
> coned Genelecs, but not much more so).
...
> Because four speakers can provide
> adequate surround sound, my intent is to frequency-divide the B-formatted
> signal and send
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:13:54PM -0700, Martin Leese wrote:
> If you have four subs then you might want to
> consider arranging them in a tetrahedron.
> Note that subs are heavy, so there is a
> practical problem with mounting them up in the
> air. (Arranging four full-range speakers in a
> te
- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130221/c45ed548/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
