Re: [Sursound] Array for sound field recording and extend the sound image

2013-01-07 Thread Dave Malham
On 7 January 2013 02:08, Chenrilin wrote: >>Do you get the same problem if you playback through four loudspeakers, or > >>is it only after HRTF manipulation ? > >>* Does the decoding work on speakers (without HRTF) ? > > The mics are omnis. And it can work on speakers well. So I think > X and Y

Re: [Sursound] Beamforming with HOA

2013-01-07 Thread Dave Malham
Hi, Have you looked at any of Angelo Farina's recent work, which essentially involves beamforming from an Eigenmike but without going through the intervening step of spherical harmonics, which has some advantages if you are looking at separating sound sources. A lot of Angelo's work in the last f

Re: [Sursound] Beamforming with HOA

2013-01-07 Thread Conor Mulvey
t; Department of Music > The University of York > Heslington > York YO10 5DD > UK > > 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio' > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > -- Conor Mulvey VisiSonics Corporation 387 Technology Dr. College Park, MD 20742 www.visisonics.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130107/f4158885/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Array for sound field recording and extend the sound image

2013-01-07 Thread Martin Leese
Chenrilin wrote: > Hello, all > I have designed an array of four microphones to get B-format signal. ... > Then I decoded > them to get the > feeding signal for four loudspeakers, and used HRTFs to get the left and > right signal for headphone. > > 1. Furthermore, the experiment is made that

Re: [Sursound] Array for sound field recording and extend the sound image

2013-01-07 Thread Aaron Heller
mponents. > > Regards, > Martin > -- > Martin J Leese > E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org > Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound >

Re: [Sursound] Array for sound field recording and extend the sound image

2013-01-07 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:12:26PM -0800, Aaron Heller wrote: > Without more details, it hard to speculate about problems, but I'll note > that subtracting the outputs of two omnis to get a fig-8 response will > result in a frequency response that rises 6dB/octave with a 90 degree phase > shift re

Re: [Sursound] Array for sound field recording and extend the sound image

2013-01-07 Thread Mike Felton
>The mics are omnis It might be stating the obvious here but how would you get ANY directional information out of four OMNI mics close together? :-) Surely to get a fig-8 response you need two CARDIODS back to back (one of which is polarity reversed obviously). Mike Felton On 7 January 2013 23

Re: [Sursound] Array for sound field recording and extend the sound image

2013-01-07 Thread Chenrilin
>Hi, > Seems likely then that the problem is related to the usual "in >head" problem that many (maybe even most) people people have with >simple, non matched HRTF based systems, whether driven from decoded >Ambisonic signals or from binaurally recorded (dummy head) material. >There's been a