This seems to me somewhat exaggerated(the remarks about stereo and the
center image). Sure, the center phantom image
generated as a sum of two identical L/R signals sounds a little different.
But little is the operative word. The correction for this fairly small
(Meridian used to have it up on
Jorn is spot on with his analysis.
Every live sound show I've worked (8 years+) has had all the amplifiers on
maximum. Even those without DSP. You choose what you want the SPL at the desk
via the master faders, and balance accordingly to that SPL. Mixing 'backwards'
(Jorn's last point) is EXAC
I'm not. But also, this way of working is fine if the system is well designed.
With some rental companies, this is not always the case.
John
On 15 Oct 2012, at 20:16, Andrew Horsburgh wrote:
> If we're not talking about rock, metal, pop, electronic or dance music - then
> perhaps maximum isn'
On 10/14/2012 09:45 AM, Richard Lee wrote:
well, depends. iirc, theile's argument is that a two-speaker
phantom source should be a mess in terms of spectrum, but isn't (as
two-speaker stereophony demonstrates). so for some reason, the
brain is able to sort it out. more than two correlated sources
On 10/12/2012 09:22 AM, Dave Malham wrote:
Some other interesting statements, for instance page 7, "Thus,
stationary-source elevation cannot practically be accomplished" -
it's been a while since i read that paper, but isn't that sentence
specifically about auro-3d?
the title seems to suggest
Fs but we do also have a spherical
microphone array that we build, use and sell. Using beamforming, we have
recorded environments for speaker arrays.
Just a thought,
Conor
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:33:09PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> regardless of whether you consider a two-source phantom spectrum
> good or bad, i guess we can agree a three-source one is wy
> worse?
No. Why should that be ?
Theile always repeats that we can handle two correlated sourc
On 2012-10-12, Peter Lennox wrote:
as an aside (and without looking it up) ossuary clearly means some
official receptacle for bones, I would guess?
Uhhuh. It's a sort of a secondary burial site where you either dump, or
sometimes also carefully place, people's bones, once they've been
cleane
On 2012-10-12, Paul Hodges wrote:
Melee (no accents in English)
This remark surprised me, so I checked.
In English foreign spelling and articulation for loans is often retained
for a considerable time. That's precisely the mechanism by which it has
gathered such a stupendous vocabulary and
On 2012-10-13, Dave Hunt wrote:
http://www.auro-technologies.com/uploads/Auro3D-Octopus-White-Paper-v2-7-2017.pdf
Will read. If ambisonic relevant, will put into Motherlode in time.
It concludes that although 24-bit operation is advantageous for audio
creation purposes it is inadvisable
.. was Somting for the Weekend - Commerisal 3D sound
> Sure, the center phantom image generated as a sum of two identical L/R
> signals sounds a little different. But little is the operative word. ... Most
> people do not notice this at all.
It's not that we don't notice but that we are so used
11 matches
Mail list logo
