Hi Marc
I've certainly thought about doing that, but not initially since it means that
(a) you would be limited to passive speakers
(b) the specs aren't as good as the Analog Devices ADAU1966, the evaluation board for which is
sitting next to me :-)
(c) serious levels of hardware design neede
Thought you just might have meant that :-)
Dave
On 10/07/2012 02:24, Marc Lavallée wrote:
I meant:
"one D/A conversion"
I wrote:
It's possible to skip the A/D conversion by using amplifiers with
digital inputs. Texas Instruments have a 8 channels digital to PWM
converter that can drive D-
It's implied, but not really explicitly given in
'Ambisonics Encoding of Other Audio Formats for Multiple Listening Conditions' by Daniel, Jérome;
Rault, Jean-Bernard; Polack, Jean-Dominique
AES Convention:105 (September 1998) Paper Number:4795.
I think there's a corrected version on Jerome's
On 07/09/2012 06:15 PM, Simon Edmonds wrote:
using first order for reverb is fine as the overall localisation is not
critical. In the next incarnation of my system I will have a 3rd order
mixer but still using a 1st order send and reverb
i used to say the same, but i have found it's not true a
On 07/09/2012 03:17 PM, GP wrote:
I did wonder about using Daniel Courville's plugins to do decoding
for the height info separate to HARPEX. The HARPEX decoding does
sound good ( how can I confirm it is 3rd order over 8 speakers?) and
so if I could add height using another approach that would be
_
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/201
Hi Dave
Dave Malham a écrit :
> Hi Marc
>
> I've certainly thought about doing that, but not initially since it
> means that
>
> (a) you would be limited to passive speakers
This limitation is a feature: with less hardware the cost is lowered
and the quality is raised. It would be a good choi
