On 05/29/2012 08:24 PM, Bearcat M. Şandor wrote:
This touches on something i've wondered for a while now. Discrete surround
always sounds as though it's in a fixed ring to me. Sounds are always the same
distance away. I've experianced that with binaural recordings as well. Is there
a surround s
b153f60d/attachment.bin
> >
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>
------ next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music
s://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120530/352e76fd/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Surso
Wow - thats real startrek material right there Dave ! I was letting my
imagination wander in a similar area the other day and was wondering
if the beating/harmonics caused by two beams of electromagnetic waves
could somehow excite the air where their paths crossed causing a sound
to eminate from th
Of course, the other way is to attach a small, high power speaker to a trained
fly
Dr Peter Lennox
School of Technology
University of Derby, UK
tel: 01332 593155
e: p.len...@derby.ac.uk
-Original Message-
From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] O
> Bearcat
> -- next part --
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 198 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120529/b153f60d/attach
In the early seventies, I remember Trevor Wishart doing a "spatial audio" piece by putting battery
powered cassette recorders in suitcases and having the performers move around carrying them (and I'm
sure there have been other such...)
However, back to the present - given the progress the milit
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Augustine Leudar wrote:
> but anyone listening carefully would have heard a fly about 1 foot high !
This magnification effect has been reported many times.
I wonder how much it has to do with playing back at too high
levels. We do associate LF energy and
part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120530/d98fd64a/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
sic.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120530/57acbdc5/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
> Is there a surround sound method that will
> reproduce actual depth enough so that you
> could track the movment of a fly in a room?
A while back I started making a series of simultaneous binaural and 1st-order
soundfield recordings. The purpose is to compare them in reproduction, with a
c
The problem is, a sound sources as close to your ear as a mosquito is
essentially a mono signal on one ear, you practically hear nothing on the other
ear.
That's pretty much impossible to do with anything than a headphone setup, or
some phase cancelation while your head is clamped down such as
g of the recording. How much localization info do you believe will
be lost? Could be fun, plus I’m a firm believer in learning by doing.
Thanks for reading,
Eric
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/s
uld be done in an
anechoic chamber ... because you will be capturing not just the effect of
the microphone, and the limitations in the decoding, as well as the
character of the speakers, but also the character of the room.
Etienne
> Thanks for reading,
> Eric
> -- next par
14 matches
Mail list logo
