We've had a decent number of abstracts submitted for this, but just in case you hadn't noticed, we
extended the deadline to next Monday (19th) as a result of some requests from possible contributors
- so, if you didn't manage to get your abstract in in time and thought you'd missed the boat - now
egular layouts, but
> not in the case of the 5.1 one. This complicates
> matters.
>
> Looking at the HF order gains for the 5.1 decoder
> it seems the ratio is close to 5.8 dB, but this
> doesn't mean anything as the matrices are quite
> different.
>
> Ciao,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 09:34:04AM -, Richard Lee wrote:
> Does anyone have Fons' 5.1 matrices handy that they could
> send me? I can't promise anything quick as its 35C in the
> shade and 100% RH in Cooktown and my small brain is boiling.
Here (Parma) it's around 3C and 100% RH (thick mist
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> The matrix columns are W,X,Y.
I gather that Ambdec version 3 files (v. 0.5.1) use ACN for the
coefficient ordering, which would make it W, Y, X.
For example the LF coefficients you give for the CE speaker (dir=[1,0,0]) are
> add_row
On 16/12/11 17:48, Aaron Heller wrote:
It's in the high-50s (F) and about 40% RH here in Menlo Park
It zero degrees here at Hest Bank on the edge of Morecambe Bay in the
north of England and the water in the air has turned solid.
I will need some time to digest all this information.
It mig
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 09:48:17AM -0800, Aaron Heller wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > The matrix columns are W,X,Y.
>
> I gather that Ambdec version 3 files (v. 0.5.1) use ACN for the
> coefficient ordering, which would make it W, Y, X.
Absolutely right - v
Is BLaH4 available anywhere apart from the AES site? I am not a member,
only curious.
Gerard Lardner
On 16/12/2011 09:34, Richard Lee wrote:
> BLaH4, "Design of Ambisonic Decoders for Irregular Arrays of
> Loudspeakers by Non- Linear Optimization" Heller et al, preprint 8243
> AES San Francisco n
