/11
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110812/759cbf06/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Hi Richard
I don't know the answers - I didn't even realise that there had been a
change in the UHJ spec. (It would be good to know the answers if you find
out - I've got a fairly early York Ambisonic cassette lurking somewhere that
I've yet to hear in surround). I'm just getting round to thinkin
part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110812/64db404e/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
ethods based on post 1980's equations would be?
>
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>
>
> -
> No virus found in thi
_
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>
>
> -
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3828 - Rel
The change to UHJ at that time is very small and was made just to get rid
of the need for another phase shifter in the decoder (IIRC).
Any of the Classic Decoders, the Integrex, Minims, A&D etc will decode this
properly.
I for one would be most interested in a copy of the recording as it
repre
TML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110812/e971199f/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound