Apologies for cross posting / advertisement...
Experimental Computer Music Producers Wanted
The Music Research Centre, University of York (UK) is looking for highly
motivated producers of computer music and sound art for a one-year MA in Music
Technology. The centre has outstanding production f
On 06/05/2011 01:26, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
...
i was mentioning this 3rd vs. 4th thing because bruce wiggins examined
the use of HO components for the "steering" of a 5.1 decode (which in
principle is not capable of more than 2nd order precision, but HO can
help mend the irregularities iiuc)
the
kernel form himself.
Geoffrey
-- next part ------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110506/03a2a192/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Hi,
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 03:15:51 -
From: Richard Lee
The Encoding eqns on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Ambisonic_UHJ_format are correct and come from Gerzon himself.
"Ambisonics in Multichannel Broadcasting and Video". JAES nov85, 33
(11): 859-871.
Snip
[1] The optimum 2
I use two octagons with one above the other. The decoding is much
simpler for Z with the angles the same. My decoder is based on the
angle from zero in front.
ThomasChen
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Lopes
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 10:46 am
Subjec
lters than for three- and four-channel UHJ (and B-Format)" at
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110506/132ff200/attachment.html>
___
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:17:40PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 08:03 PM, Aaron Heller wrote:
>> Contact me
>> off list if you want the Ambdec config files I used.
>
> i'd love to see them. any chance of you making them publicly available
> (such as in a "contributions" folder
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:06:15PM +0100, Richard wrote:
> Working with the numbers given and using W' as W*sqrt(2), I get
> (though I may have made the odd error)
>
> W'' = W (1.442) + X( 0.0986) + j*Y(0.1075)
> X'' = W( 0.133) +X(0.43) - j*Y(0.543)
> Y'' = j* W(0.143) + j*X(0.4
Given the almost universal acceptance of WP as the font of all information, it
might be worth someone(s) from this group putting a 'watch for changes on this
page' tag on the Amb. pages.
drw
On 06/05/2011, at 7:15 AM, Paul Hodges wrote:
> --On 06 May 2011 03:15 + Richard Lee wrote:
>
>>
"Richard" wrote:
> Phew!!! Firstly, many thanks for the detailed response. I'll admit I find
> the math's related to UHJ & Ambisonics somewhat confusing at times, but 'm
> persevering.
Ignore Wikipedia. Instead, stick with the
Gerzon 1985 paper (which yoiu now have).
Regards,
Martin
--
Martin
was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110506/2973944c/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
I believe that angle between speakers are important. We will fuse
angles of 60 degrees or less. I have found that 45 degrees fuse well
and most people are unable to locate speakers. I also found that with
height helps fuse the image. I use B+ which adds a stereo front
earlier in time plus B
12 matches
Mail list logo
