On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:39:01AM +1100, e deleflie wrote:
> > OTOH, the main consideration for choosing ACN was that these things
> > will in most cases be handled by tools and code rather than by humans.
>
> I have found that the *most* error prone step is hooking up the Jack
> channels from m
On 11/26/2010 12:59 AM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
>> Can you convince me to use the ACN scheme?
it is very well documented on michael chapman's site.
http://ambisonics.ch/standards/channels/
very big plus :)
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487
Meister f
/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20101126/4be7b5fb/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
On 25 Nov 2010, at 18:00, sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:21:16 -0500
From: Daniel Courville
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Malfunctioning ST350 control unit
As to the polarity issue, L,R are indeed inverted w.r.t. X,Y,Z
for front, left, up respectively. It
Le 10-11-26 11:32, Justin Bennett a écrit :
>>If somebody with a ST350 could check the W against the L/R set to omni
>>pattern / 0 width, we would have sort of an answer and something to
>>ask
>>SoundField...
>
>I recorded W and Left (set to omni pattern, 0 width as you suggested)
>simultaneously.
Hi George,
Ooops, I guess I should have been more specific... A VST plugin.
The description is of an awesome-sounding player, but ultimately
I want to manipulate recorded material in AudioMulch.
You might try VVMicVST from David McGriffy
(http://www.vvaudio.com/products/vvmicvst) . We provid
Some like to do it the hard way:
http://auro-3d.com/index.html
sic
Eero
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Quite interesting, but I since height perception can be coded into
normal channels it seems like a lot of work to gain very little.
Joern Rune Kviserud
Midgard Audio
Den 26.11.2010 19:36, skrev Eero Aro:
Some like to do it the hard way:
http://auro-3d.com/index.html
sic
Eero
___
- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20101126/badba3ae/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
On 11/26/2010 07:36 PM, Eero Aro wrote:
> Some like to do it the hard way:
>
> http://auro-3d.com/index.html
it's all the rage here at tonmeistertagung. the good thing is: there are
some industry heavyweights pulling in the same direction, so they might
just make it happen. i think that scheme is
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:28:27PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> let's hope we can surf the wake and profit from the general interest in
> with-height sound reproduction and get some people to ask the right
> questions.
First question: how does it compare to 3h1v ?
Ciao,
--
FA
There are
>As to the polarity issue, L,R are indeed inverted w.r.t. X,Y,Z
>for front, left, up respectively. It could be the Lemo to XLR
>breakout cable - did you check the wiring ?
The Mk4 had WXYZ inverted wrt stereo outputs. I think the stereo outputs are
"correct". (pressure increase -> Omni increase)
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:24:30AM -, Richard Lee wrote:
> >As to the polarity issue, L,R are indeed inverted w.r.t. X,Y,Z
> >for front, left, up respectively. It could be the Lemo to XLR
> >breakout cable - did you check the wiring ?
>
> The Mk4 had WXYZ inverted wrt stereo outputs. I think
13 matches
Mail list logo
