On 2013-05-21, Dave Hunt wrote:
So, there must be quite a lot going on in Focusrite's Liquid Channel.
http://global.focusrite.com/mic-pres-channel-strips/liquid-channel
Reputedly Focusrite license a system from Sintefex.
http://www.sintefex.com/docs/appnotes/dynaconv.PDF
There's altogether to
Hi,
So, there must be quite a lot going on in Focusrite's Liquid Channel.
http://global.focusrite.com/mic-pres-channel-strips/liquid-channel
Reputedly Focusrite license a system from Sintefex.
http://www.sintefex.com/docs/appnotes/dynaconv.PDF
Ciao,
Dave Hunt
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 20:33:3
On 2013-05-20, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
So it seems that a stronger definition of TI is not necesssary.
At the same time there is a definite point to compressors being "kind of
time-variant" and only weakly nonlinear. They certainly don't behave
like a distortion pedal or anything like that.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:18:35AM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 01:26 AM, Richard Dobson wrote:
>
> > I have always understood it to mean that the behaviour is not dependent
> > upon ~when~ the signal is injected. Thus, a plain delay is TI because
> > everything is always dela
