Re: [Sursound] Malfunctioning ST350 control unit / Phase

2010-11-29 Thread Daniel Courville
Le 10-11-28 08:22, Justin Bennett a écrit : >W is 3dB down of course. I guess it's trivial to flip the phase after >recording Thanks. Yes, it is trivial in most DAWs. - Daniel ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/

Re: [Sursound] Malfunctioning ST350 control unit / Phase

2010-11-28 Thread Justin Bennett
W is 3dB down of course. I guess it's trivial to flip the phase after recording, - & thanks Richard, it's good to know that this is "normal" !! Justin Thanks for your test. Is the amplitude the same or is the W 3 dB lower? This is beginning to look like a "feature". I seem to remember

Re: [Sursound] Malfunctioning ST350 control unit

2010-11-26 Thread Daniel Courville
Le 10-11-26 11:32, Justin Bennett a écrit : >>If somebody with a ST350 could check the W against the L/R set to omni >>pattern / 0 width, we would have sort of an answer and something to >>ask >>SoundField... > >I recorded W and Left (set to omni pattern, 0 width as you suggested) >simultaneously.

Re: [Sursound] Malfunctioning ST350 control unit

2010-11-26 Thread Justin Bennett
On 25 Nov 2010, at 18:00, sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote: Message: 1 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:21:16 -0500 From: Daniel Courville Subject: Re: [Sursound] Malfunctioning ST350 control unit As to the polarity issue, L,R are indeed inverted w.r.t. X,Y,Z for front, left, up respectively

Re: [Sursound] Malfunctioning ST350 control unit

2010-11-25 Thread Justin Bennett
You mean that the SoundField-supplied B-Format breakout cable would have all it's + and - inverted? If somebody with a ST350 could check the W against the L/R set to omni pattern / 0 width, we would have sort of an answer and something to ask SoundField... Since last week i'm the proud o

Re: [Sursound] Malfunctioning ST350 control unit

2010-11-24 Thread fons
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:21:16PM -0500, Daniel Courville wrote: > Le 10-11-23 17:44, f...@kokkinizita.net a écrit : > > >As to the polarity issue, L,R are indeed inverted w.r.t. X,Y,Z > >for front, left, up respectively. It could be the Lemo to XLR > >breakout cable - did you check the wiring ?

Re: [Sursound] Malfunctioning ST350 control unit

2010-11-24 Thread Daniel Courville
Le 10-11-23 17:44, f...@kokkinizita.net a écrit : >As to the polarity issue, L,R are indeed inverted w.r.t. X,Y,Z >for front, left, up respectively. It could be the Lemo to XLR >breakout cable - did you check the wiring ? You mean that the SoundField-supplied B-Format breakout cable would have al

Re: [Sursound] Malfunctioning ST350 control unit

2010-11-23 Thread fons
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:54:12AM -0500, Daniel Courville wrote: > I made a small test recording yesterday morning for those intrigued by the > ST350 problems: I can confirm what you wrote. Except that W isn't just -20 dB or so down, it's completely broken. It does produce some distorted signal

Re: [Sursound] Malfunctioning ST350 control unit

2010-11-23 Thread Daniel Courville
Le 10-11-21 16:20, Daniel Courville a écrit : >the test revealed the the W output is going bad: at least 20 dB >down in output compared to what it should be. So I decided the use >the stereo output for the W by setting it to omni pattern and 0 degree >width in L/R mode. > >Connecting to the Left/M