Re: [Sursound] Anthropometrics, Loudspeakers, & Vision

2013-04-03 Thread Peter Lennox
ailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Carmichel Sent: 02 April 2013 22:51 To: sursound@music.vt.edu Subject: Re: [Sursound] Anthropometrics, Loudspeakers, & Vision Hello Etienne and all Sursound Readers, Many thanks for your response, insight, and “food for thought”. You brou

Re: [Sursound] Anthropometrics, Loudspeakers, & Vision

2013-04-03 Thread Peter Lennox
inal Message- From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of etienne deleflie Sent: 02 April 2013 00:29 To: Eric Carmichel; Surround Sound discussion group Subject: Re: [Sursound] Anthropometrics, Loudspeakers, & Vision > > Head width were certainly a

Re: [Sursound] Anthropometrics, Loudspeakers, & Vision

2013-04-02 Thread Eric Carmichel
Hello Etienne and all Sursound Readers, Many thanks for your response, insight, and “food for thought”. You brought up interesting points which, in turn, prompted me to dig deeper into Ecological Psychology (referring to the Gibsonian school). There’s certainly something to be said for choosing

Re: [Sursound] Anthropometrics, Loudspeakers, & Vision

2013-04-01 Thread etienne deleflie
> > Head width were certainly affect ITDs, but to what extent does this alter > our sense of sound-source direction? Relatively gross errors seem to have > minimal affect on lateralization, but this is different from localization > in 3D. Pinna size and shape alter the spectral nature (name phase /