Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 68, Issue 17

2014-03-19 Thread Iain Mott
Em Wed, 2014-03-19 às 20:21 +, Fons Adriaensen escreveu: > Another approach would be to sent W only (at reference level) > to the decoder, and then measure each individual speaker (by > soloing it, ambdec provides the function) and adjusting for > reference SPL - 10 * log(number_of speakers). T

Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 68, Issue 17

2014-03-19 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 07:50:43PM +, Dave Hunt wrote: > The panning approach won't work, as all speakers would be excited at > various different levels. Anything to substantiate that claim ? Practice ? Theory ? FYI, I have used this method a number of times, with excellent results. I've al

Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 68, Issue 17

2014-03-19 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 07:50:43PM +, Dave Hunt wrote: > Surely the best approach is to feed the noise signal (post decoder) > into each speaker channel in turn and adjust the amplification on > each channel until the level measured at the centre listening point > is the same for each speaker.

Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 68, Issue 17

2014-03-19 Thread Dave Hunt
Hi, Surely the best approach is to feed the noise signal (post decoder) into each speaker channel in turn and adjust the amplification on each channel until the level measured at the centre listening point is the same for each speaker. The panning approach won't work, as all speakers woul