On 04/01/2012 11:55 AM, Augustine Leudar wrote:
I am getting a many opinions on this as possible and I have now heard
various answers. It specifically relates to boosted band and, in this
scenario, elevation cues in the median plane . Blauert's 1969 experiment
showed that if an if a narrow band n
Thanks for the ref. Pity, it is AES, which I am not a member of, and $20
is a lot to pay for a 29-yr-old paper of mostly anecdotal interest :-(
Richard Dobson
On 01/04/2012 13:36, Eero Aro wrote:
Richard Dobson wrote:
Out of interest - what research has been done on this where the
listeners w
Richard Dobson wrote:
Out of interest - what research has been done on this where the
listeners were lying down?
The subject is not my area, but I know of an old paper:
James Lackner: Influence of Posture on the Spatial Localization of Sound
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=4554
Eero
Out of interest - what research has been done on this where the
listeners were lying down? Do they hear such sounds still as "above",
or behind their heads? And, in the same vein, one the degree of such
perception with respect to intensity?
Richard Dobson
On 01/04/2012 12:56, Robert Greene
Actually, I think the ear/brain does not make
this distinction without pattern recogntion,
in other words, the height impression to the
extent that it arises from spectrum of the sound
depends on what the ear/brain expects the actual
sound to be. There is a similar effect about
frontal versus rea
I am getting a many opinions on this as possible and I have now heard
various answers. It specifically relates to boosted band and, in this
scenario, elevation cues in the median plane . Blauert's 1969 experiment
showed that if an if a narrow band noise or sinusoid wave with a centre
frequency of 8
