uot; techniques.
From: Eric Carmichel
To: "sursound@music.vt.edu"
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 4:33 PM
Subject: [Sursound] Of stereo miking, Fourier analysis, and Ambisonics
Many thanks to everyone for your responses and insights (re Giving Precedence
to Ambisonics). I wou
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 06:13:19PM -0700, Robert Greene wrote:
> I do not understand the last bit of this message below at all.
> There is no such thing as a signal that is limited
> in bandwidth and in time--not if limited
> means actually 0 outside a finite interval
> in both cases. This is a b
I do not understand the last bit of this message below at all.
There is no such thing as a signal that is limited
in bandwidth and in time--not if limited
means actually 0 outside a finite interval
in both cases. This is a basic result of Fourier
analysis.
This kind of signal does not exist, not
Re: Of stereo miking, Fourier analysis, and Ambisonics
***excerpt from previous post: ...Instead of the required condition for the
latter - the signal being limited in bandwidth - the condition for the discrete
spectrum being a complete (i.e. invertible) description of the signal is that
the si
At 06:34 28/6/2013, Eric Carmichel wrote:
>The technique assumes that the live source is *stereo* too; that is, a
>stage ahead of the mics with musicians aligned in rows that have L-R
>orientations.
Actually, if you think about it, the Blumlein technique assumes that
the musicians are arranged
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:33:46PM -0700, Eric Carmichel wrote:
> I have to agree with Joern that the example miking demonstration
> isn’t all that fair, and for another reason: How much low-frequency
> energy can a 2-inch speaker provide?
I don't know what kind of signal was used for this test,
Hello Jeff,
I wasn't criticizing the preferred miking technique; just saying the demo
itself had inherent limitations. One of my favorite mic techniques is the
Blumlein arrangement, but this isn't terribly popular in the US. The
disadvantage of the Blumlein is that sound sources from the rear o
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 4:33 PM
>Subject: [Sursound] Of stereo miking, Fourier analysis, and Ambisonics
>
>
>Many thanks to everyone for your responses and insights (re Giving Precedence
>to Ambisonics). I would like to comment on the following two responses:
>1. from Je
Many thanks to everyone for your responses and insights (re Giving Precedence
to Ambisonics). I would like to comment on the following two responses:
1. from Jeff
**May I suggest “Demonstration of Stereo Microphone Techniques,” Performance
Recordings #6 wherein 18 coincident, near-coincident and
