Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins - follow up Question to Fons

2013-11-26 Thread Richard Furse
To: sursound@music.vt.edu > Subject: Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins - follow up Question to > Fons > [...] > But for regular or almost regular rigs the only result of using > higher order components that the rig can't reproduce without > aliasing into lower ones would b

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins - follow up Question to Fons

2013-11-25 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 03:14:02PM -, Richard Furse wrote: > However, the Rapture3D decoders (including the TOA ones) do NOT have this > problem. One of the core features of the Rapture3D decoder generator is its > handling of arbitrary/irregular speaker layouts - a LOT of work went into > thi

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins - follow up Question to Fons

2013-11-25 Thread Richard Furse
> -Original Message- > From: Sursound [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of > Fons Adriaensen > Sent: 25 November 2013 11:03 > To: sursound@music.vt.edu > Subject: Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins - follow up Question to > Fons > > On Mon,

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins - follow up Question to Fons

2013-11-25 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 07:31:33AM +, Bo-Erik Sandholm wrote: > Am I to understand that everything is OK if I use the third order > plugins to work on my first order tetramic recording. And then I > can expect everything to be as it should if I decode just the first > order info via a first or

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins - follow up Question to Fons

2013-11-24 Thread Bo-Erik Sandholm
Hi Am I to understand that everything is OK if I use the third order plugins to work on my first order tetramic recording. And then I can expect everything to be as it should if I decode just the first order info via a first order ambdec ? I do not at this time expect to add any second or third