mm capsule)
and their lengths are 12 cm end to end. Doing an octahedron of supporting rings
is easier to do than a tetra!
umashankar
> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:37:29 +0300
> From: de...@iki.fi
> To: sursound@music.vt.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] 8 channel microphone
>
> O
On 2015-04-15, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
But I see a more serious problem. Shotgun mics work by integrating
pressure over their lenght. That means that the effective radius (the
one that determines phase/time differences between capsule signals)
will be around half the physical one. And that is r
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 07:29:48AM +0100, Dave Malham wrote:
> Sounds interesting! I think I'll leave a member of the BLaH gang and/or
> Fons to answer the calibration question, but as for the name, since it's a
> bunch of shotguns bunched together, how about 'Gat" as in short for Gatling
>
> On
Sounds interesting! I think I'll leave a member of the BLaH gang and/or
Fons to answer the calibration question, but as for the name, since it's a
bunch of shotguns bunched together, how about 'Gat" as in short for Gatling
:-)
Dave
On 13 April 2015 at 16:23, umashankar manthravadi
wrote:
>
I am planning to do an experiment and want some suggestions.
I plan to build an eight channel microphone using short shotgun capsules they
should be considered 2nd order directivity) I can design an octahedral frame to
support them. overall it will make a 12 cm radius sphere, but the capsules
