Steven Boardman wrote:
> Have you tried it with first order?
> I would of thought using one Harpexed octomic to synthesise all the spaced
> mics, would be a bit blurry, did you try with two?
Harpex only operates at first-order.
We used OctoMic's first-order B-format as input to Harpex.
We've us
Jack Reynolds wrote
> The only problem with using ambisonics mics is the high frequency limit
> above which they stop working properly. A second order ambi mic reduces
> this problem, but above about 7Khz the not quite coincident capsules
> becomes a problem.
This isn't correct.
Here's OctoMic's
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20201022/17fb6597/attachment.png>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sphear_filtered_0.png
Type: image/png
Size: 26715 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman
scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20201022/d1149564/attachment.htm>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
I upmix to third order and then use the Blue Ripple Spotlight plugin to isolate
on half of the sound field from each mic and then combine the two into a single
third order ambix signal to decode binaurally. It’s sound really nice.
I’ll post a session with some files of a dawn chorus recording wh
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Jack Reynolds wrote:
> I have had great results with a pair of spaced first order ambisonic mics
> for binaural decoding.
> Taking the left hemisphere of one of the mics, and right hemisphere of the
> other
How do you obtain only one hemisphere from a
I have had great results with a pair of spaced first order ambisonic mics for
binaural decoding. Taking the left hemisphere of one of the mics, and right
hemisphere of the other, then combining the two. The decorellation does add
something nice and spacious to the sound.
Sent from my iPhone
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 01:38:49PM +0100, Steven Boardman wrote:
> I had an Ambeo and got rid of it for this reason.
The A/B processing provided by Sennheiser sucks.
It gets a lot better with a proper A/B processor computed from
actual measurements.
Ciao,
--
FA
_
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:36:38PM +0100, jack reynolds wrote:
> The only problem with using ambisonics mics is the high frequency limit
> above which they stop working properly. A second order ambi mic reduces
> this problem, but above about 7Khz the not quite coincident capsules
> becomes a prob
> On 22 Oct 2020, at 13:19, michael strohmann wrote:
>
> regarding sound quality: i had my hand only at an sennheiser ambeo. did an
> A/B comparison with Schoeps DMS setup. while the drums i recorded sounded
> like drums via the Schoeps, they sounded like cardboard boxes via the ambeo.
> or are o
> > Sursound mailing list
> > Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
> edit account or options, view archives and so on.
>
> ___
> Sursound mailin
; > > --
> > > FA
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Sursound mailing list
> > > Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe
> here,
> > edit acc
; ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
> edit account or options, view archives and so on.
>
-- next part --
An HTML attach
Hi Jack
If the spaced array was only using cardioids, then maybe their patterns would
be more stable at higher frequencies, but not for near coincident spurs of
mid/side (and the like).
As they are even further apart than an ambisonic mic, and they aren’t
calibrated together.
Steve
> On 22 O
nfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
> edit account or options, view archives and so on.
>
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
> edit account or
> What makes you think that ORTF captures
> 'a small 8th of a sphere' ??
I don’t..
Maybe I wasn’t clear. What I meant was replacing each ORTF capsule (or M/S
pair) with an ambisonic mic, and decoding for the direction it should point.
All spaced array setups can use ambisonic mics, as they can
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 02:37:39PM +0100, Augustine Leudar wrote:
> So if you
> had say, 8 ambisonics mics pointed in 8 different directions ,in order to
> record that small 8th of a sphere (or in this case cube) in the direction
> they are pointed in (which is what the ORTF does) - how would th
17 matches
Mail list logo
