At 21:29 20-01-18, Paul Hodges wrote:
>--On 20 January 2018 20:35 +0100 David Pickett wrote:
>
>> I hadnt seen any anouncement of this, but I have just discovered that
>> Firefox (Windows version) plays my surround files in surround.
>> Previously, for these and for the BBC experiments I have had
--On 20 January 2018 20:35 +0100 David Pickett wrote:
> I hadnt seen any anouncement of this, but I have just discovered that
> Firefox (Windows version) plays my surround files in surround.
> Previously, for these and for the BBC experiments I have had to use
> Chrome. If someone with four speak
I hadnt seen any anouncement of this, but I have just discovered that
Firefox (Windows version) plays my surround files in surround.
Previously, for these and for the BBC experiments I have had to use
Chrome. If someone with four speakers would like to confirm that this
is true and I am not hal
ny Number : NI635217
Registered 63 Ballycoan rd,
Belfast BT88LL
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180120/5f11d678/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
On 01/20/2018 01:12 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 01/19/2018 08:04 PM, Gary Gallagher wrote:
Wave field synthesis wall paper? How small does an an audio pixel have to
be?
The question is more like "how big can you make it?". An audio "pixel"
of a square millimetre cannot produce meaningfu
On 01/19/2018 08:04 PM, Gary Gallagher wrote:
Wave field synthesis wall paper? How small does an an audio pixel have to
be?
The question is more like "how big can you make it?". An audio "pixel"
of a square millimetre cannot produce meaningful audio frequencies if
suspended in mid-air withou
