Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: On 12/06/2015 06:14 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote: Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: btw, since you're quoting this very interesting article, it has been partly superseded by recent research of lee at al. at huddersfield (see latest JAES), who found that there is _no_ vertic

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:48:25PM +, Stefan Schreiber wrote: Fons Adriaensen wrote: No matter what type of mic you place behind such a tiny hole, it will pick up the pressure at that tiny hole. So apart from diffraction effects the result will be omni.

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Steven Boardman
tp://stackingdwarves.net > > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- next p

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 12/06/2015 07:44 PM, Kees de Visser wrote: On 6 Dec 2015, at 11:46, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: btw, since you're quoting this very interesting article, it has been partly superseded by recent research of lee at al. at huddersfield (see latest JAES), who found that there is _no_ vertical prece

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:48:25PM +, Stefan Schreiber wrote: > Fons Adriaensen wrote: > >No matter what type of mic you place behind such a tiny hole, it > >will pick up the pressure at that tiny hole. So apart from > >diffraction effects the result will be omni. > > > > But the pressure w

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 12/06/2015 06:14 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote: Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: btw, since you're quoting this very interesting article, it has been partly superseded by recent research of lee at al. at huddersfield (see latest JAES), who found that there is _no_ vertical precendence effect and that

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Bo-Erik Sandholm
t; takes over. Using more mics (e.g. the four frontal ones >> minus the four at the back) will not improve things. >> >> > > But if it IS a hedgehog based mike, this is no issue. > > Which doesn't mean my theory is proven, but also no argument against > here...

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Stefan Schreiber
- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20151206/cdd8f043/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Kees de Visser
On 6 Dec 2015, at 11:46, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > > btw, since you're quoting this very interesting article, it has been partly > superseded by recent research of lee at al. at huddersfield (see latest > JAES), who found that there is _no_ vertical precendence effect and that > interchannel

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Stefan Schreiber
-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20151206/e4097ef1/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscr

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Stefan Schreiber wrote: Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: On 12/05/2015 05:26 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote: I wrote: "8-channel ... hedgehog", which is/was already some form of educated guess. See: http://www.hauptmikrofon.de/HW/TMT2012_3DNaturalRecording_Theile_Wittek_2012_11.pdf, pg. 19. This

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Stefan Schreiber
hment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20151206/e4097ef1/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit ac

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: On 12/05/2015 05:26 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote: I wrote: "8-channel ... hedgehog", which is/was already some form of educated guess. See: http://www.hauptmikrofon.de/HW/TMT2012_3DNaturalRecording_Theile_Wittek_2012_11.pdf, pg. 19. This hedgehog layout really fi

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 06:06:08PM +, Stefan Schreiber wrote: > Fons Adriaensen wrote: > > >* The hedgehog is at least twenty times as big. > > > Hardly... Depends on which picture you look at, but OK, let's say ten times (see Fig.12). > > The OZO's will > > be omni over most of the frequen

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Bo-Erik Sandholm
- unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20151206/e4097ef1/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 12/05/2015 05:26 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote: I wrote: "8-channel ... hedgehog", which is/was already some form of educated guess. See: http://www.hauptmikrofon.de/HW/TMT2012_3DNaturalRecording_Theile_Wittek_2012_11.pdf, pg. 19. This hedgehog layout really fits to the microphone openings o

Re: [Sursound] OZO?

2015-12-06 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 12/05/2015 07:06 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote: Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 04:26:05PM +, Stefan Schreiber wrote: See: http://www.hauptmikrofon.de/HW/TMT2012_3DNaturalRecording_Theile_Wittek_2012_11.pdf, pg. 19. This hedgehog layout really fits to the microphone op