Re: [Sursound] Volume question WRT 7.1 sound recorded at listening position. (dw)

2013-09-24 Thread Andy Furniss
Andrew Levine wrote: See Bob Katz' K-20: http://www.digido.com/how-to-make-better-recordings-part-2.html Thanks for the link, looks interesting, though I haven't had time to read properly yet. Accepting the above may give insight into my query, just to be clear I am not a producer in a

Re: [Sursound] Volume question WRT 7.1 sound recorded at listening position.

2013-09-24 Thread Andy Furniss
Aaron Heller wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Andy Furniss wrote: I don't quite understand the "in phase" though, are you saying that they artificially adjust phase for the same sound that comes out of more than one speaker to affect the mixdown? The Recording Academy recommendat

Re: [Sursound] Volume question WRT 7.1 sound recorded at listening position. (dw)

2013-09-24 Thread Andy Furniss
Ken Landers wrote: In years past, a number of systems has issues with intra-sample peaks. While a technical 0 dBFS cleared, the interpolated level between the peaks would cause distortion. From a best practices for broadcast point of view, my colleagues and I have just tried to steer clear of a

Re: [Sursound] Volume question WRT 7.1 sound recorded at listening position. (dw)

2013-09-24 Thread Andrew Levine
See Bob Katz' K-20: http://www.digido.com/how-to-make-better-recordings-part-2.html Regards, Andrew Levine -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130924/7cd3e952/attachm