Hi,
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 02:22:58PM +1000, Noel Butler via Starlink wrote:
> Oh I agree it's not a good situation, but my point was it's still most
> dominant 30 years after they claimed we had about 5 years,
This is not actually a contradiction.
IPv4 *has* run out - but that does not mean (
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 08:25:31AM +0200, Sebastian Moeller via Starlink wrote:
> ***) Strictly speaking IPv6 is required, since "internet access"
> is defined as reaching all of the internet (as far as in the ISPs
> power) and IPv6-only sites are not reachable for the CG-NAT-only
> customers.
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 09:14:27AM +0200, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> [SM] Has Vodafone started using IPv6 for their DSL-users yet*? About
> the content that is an interesting question, I will try to measure in my home
> network what IPv4/IPv6 traffic ration I actually see.
Many high-v
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 08:24:13AM +0200, Sebastian Moeller via Starlink wrote:
> [SM] In the EU we have this as a continuous lobbying effort by big
> incumbent ISPs (a move to have the large content providers (CAPs) shoulder
> their "fair" share of the cost of modernizing the networks
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
> Le 08/12/2023 à 09:40, Steven a écrit :
> > Your router obtains an address using SLAAC for your WAN interface from a
> > /64 (not sure if this /64 is unique to each customer or shared).
>
> This - /64 shared a
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:07:10PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
> subscriber ; they light only one, equalling 1gbit/s. It means that they could
> scale it up later to 4 or 5 gbit/s, without additional installation. At the
You do not need multiple fibers to transfer more tha
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:43:25PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> So, a requirement to a competitive satcom would be like 25 Gbit/s. I think it
> is not impossible to make, if many intermediate layers (HAPS, drones etc)
> are used, and larger band widths.
As was noted upthread, raw bandw
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:46:06PM +0100, Frantisek Borsik via Starlink wrote:
> The same is true for missing/loosing support for FWA in the grand/funding
> schemes: all the arguments thrown around by fiber cheerleaders are based
> on bandwidth (at best) or "speed" (in most cases) or some the
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 07:11:16PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
> sorry, it could be that I have it on the wrong side.
>
> If VRRP and starlink like to have that IPv6 LL address with ff:fe inside,
> and always constant, so be it. There might be some reasons for it to be that
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 04:07:54PM -0700, David Lang via Starlink wrote:
> What right do you have to say that the programmer's time is less important
> than the ram/bandwidth used?
A single computer programmer saving some two hours in not optimizing code,
costing 1 extra minute for each of a
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 10:13:35PM +0200, David Fernández via Starlink wrote:
> Dear participants of this list,
>
> If you had a router that in lab conditions, with Gigabit Ethernet
> interfaces, that losses 1 or 2 out of a few thousands of UDP packets
> of a few hundreds of bytes each one, d
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 01:54:26PM +0100, David Fernández via Starlink wrote:
> FYI: The issue with packet losses was solved after the router was
> properly synchronized using NTP, reaching up to 100 pps during 60 s
> without losses and latency < 20 ms.
This makes even less sense than before.
12 matches
Mail list logo
