Le 28/02/2024 à 21:03, tomaso.dec...@dlr.de a écrit :
Yes very true, but I think this spec came from a scenario setup where all
IP-based functionalities were not necessary, i.e. more like protocol
encapsulation rather than actual IP operations. And moreover we are talking of
a spec published
Le 28/02/2024 à 20:28, Marc Blanchet a écrit :
Le 28 févr. 2024 à 13:53, Tomaso de Cola via Starlink
a écrit :
But there exists already a CCSDS spec for IP over CCSDS…
Right, but it is underspecified. It just specifies which value to put in the
frame to identify IP in the payload. It does n
Le 28/02/2024 à 19:53, tomaso.dec...@dlr.de a écrit :
But there exists already a CCSDS spec for IP over CCSDS…
Moreover the snapshot you attached is about TC frames, I.e. for telecommand
services…
If they gave another example of non telecommand services, or if they
told that IPv6 must not be
Yes very true, but I think this spec came from a scenario setup where all
IP-based functionalities were not necessary, i.e. more like protocol
encapsulation rather than actual IP operations. And moreover we are talking of
a spec published in 2012…
Tomaso
Sent from my iPhone
> On 28. Feb 2024,
> Le 28 févr. 2024 à 13:53, Tomaso de Cola via Starlink
> a écrit :
>
> But there exists already a CCSDS spec for IP over CCSDS…
Right, but it is underspecified. It just specifies which value to put in the
frame to identify IP in the payload. It does not talk about how to actually use
IPv6 i
But there exists already a CCSDS spec for IP over CCSDS…
Moreover the snapshot you attached is about TC frames, I.e. for telecommand
services…
Tomaso
Sent from my iPhone
> On 28. Feb 2024, at 18:47, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink
> wrote:
>
> The CCSDS spec is an interesting document.
>
>
The CCSDS spec is an interesting document.
I am trying to find a packet dump of a CCSDS packet that travelled in
space according to this CCSDS spec. If there is a place with CCSDS
packet dumps I am interested to see them.
Given that, I could think about writing an IPv6-over-CCSDS preliminary