Le 25/01/2024 à 02:54, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit :
On 25/01/2024 1:37 am, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
Thanks for the tests!
The dl/ul speeds 300/15 mbit/s are impressive.
"Speeds" (observed data rates) in terms of Starlink hardware are
actually fairly meaningless as th
On 25/01/2024 1:37 am, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
Thanks for the tests!
The dl/ul speeds 300/15 mbit/s are impressive.
"Speeds" (observed data rates) in terms of Starlink hardware are
actually fairly meaningless as they depend on:
* Satellite(s) involved in the data transfer ov
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, Oleg Kutkov via Starlink wrote:
The PoE "standard" is the same.
That is true, but the pinout is slightly different on the articulated dish
David Lang
Thus, you can power the new terminal with any Starlink PoE injector (even
REV1).
On 1/25/24 01:40, Jonathan Bennett wr
I'm mainly curious if the move back to RJ45 means they are now using a real
POE standard, instead of the custom solution the previous generations have
used.
Jonathan Bennett
Hackaday.com
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:47 PM Oleg Kutkov via Starlink <
starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> I will t
I will try to do better tests this weekend, measuring all the necessary
parameters. Plus IPv6
On 1/24/24 14:37, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
Thanks for the tests!
The dl/ul speeds 300/15 mbit/s are impressive.
At video pointer 5:53 the reported Ping ?/dl/ul 88/204/121 ms and
Jitter
Thanks for the tests!
The dl/ul speeds 300/15 mbit/s are impressive.
At video pointer 5:53 the reported Ping ?/dl/ul 88/204/121 ms and Jitter
9.2 ms seem interesting.
==> I am not sure which of the two (ping or jitter) you name 'latency'?
==> I am not sure why the dl (download) ping
I conducted the initial comparative tests of the new terminal in
Ukraine. I guess it's not a really "legal" because the new terminal is
not certified and not selling outside the US for the moment. But who cares.
Here's a video: https://youtu.be/hWPMpJrjd1g
I will try to do more technical tests
