, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), p...@uvic.ca,
Web.UVic.CA/~pan
On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 4:15 PM Noel Butler via Starlink
wrote:
I run an open access usenet server, but only for those within my CC,
so access is by IP based on our CC allocations from APNIC.
Because IPv4 exhaustion this changes sometimes
I run an open access usenet server, but only for those within my CC, so
access is by IP based on our CC allocations from APNIC.
Because IPv4 exhaustion this changes sometimes with buying allocations
from other regions, and if they get denied access I encourage them to
let us know so we can kee
At least two articles I've read tonight confirm they are still AC
powered
The RV option is AC powered, yes.
The significant cost is for the mobility "pro" version, one article
indicated 599 for the standard (I assume that's USD but can't confirm)
I think, as on this mailing list, that a lot of
On 25/09/2023 21:45, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink wrote:
The "RV" option available in Australia and NZ at this time is indeed
the residential option without the cell lock. It's intended for
stationary use and assumes that you have a mains (AC) power source.
We've tried it here with the much
On 25/09/2023 18:06, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
ah, sorry, probably we speak of the same thing.
I dont know whether or not the current in-car starlink devices require
an extra 12v-to-220V/110V adapter, or whether it's included, or
integrated.
Here, the "RV" is identical to a ho
When the heck are starlink going to release a true "RV unit" that is
12v?
Sure we can hack it to do what starlink should have been doing all
along, but that's ugly, it voids our warranties, and is only of use to
those who have some understanding electronics.
Surely they can design a 12v RV m
On 25/09/2023 15:00, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink wrote:
IPv6 adoption in Australia (and NZ) is a bit behind the curve,
internationally.
A bit? We're dragging our heels :) Very strange too since Geoff is from
AU, in fact my home city, fun fact, until I move about 15 years ago we
apparently
On 23/09/2023 20:53, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink wrote:
Now what that tells me is that you and those that use your mail / web
servers are within networks that are either in networks that are old
and have legacy IPv4 allocations, or that are new, desparate, and rich.
Mail is mostly Australian
On 25/09/2023 04:30, Michael Richardson wrote:
FUD they came out with in mid 90's about IPv4's imminent demise giving
I think you malign Geoff to no purpose.
Geoff Houston is brilliant in putting up well thought out strawmans
(strawmen? Strawpeople?), often with the goal of cristalizing what
Hi Vint,
On 23/09/2023 11:47, Vint Cerf wrote:
Noel, IPv4 is only managing to work because it is NATted - going to
IPv6 let's us get back to point-to-point in either direction including
rendezvous.
The present IPv4 situation is NOT good - people are paying $35-50 per
IPv4 address to acquire o
On 20/09/2023 11:13, Dave Taht via Starlink wrote:
As vs Geoffs presentation on QUIC eating the universe in terms of
traffic volume, and the world becoming a giant content distribution
network, I still hold, that the internet is a communications network,
and that despite content moving ever cl
11 matches
Mail list logo
