On 2012-02-29 21:08 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:25:28PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> From: Ian Kent
>> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:45:44 +0800
>>
>> commits a32744d4abae24572eff7269bc17895c41bd0085,
>> 3c761ea05a8900a907f32b628611873f6bef24b2, and
>> 048c
On 2012-02-28 02:05 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
Alas, the commit below broke the WiFi on my laptop, where
"iwlist wlan0 scan" now just reports: " wlan0 No scan results".
This is not specific to 3.2, the same problem exis
On 2012-03-04 22:53 +0100, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> The laptop is an Acer TravelMate 2490 with a Broadcom chip:
>>
>> ,
>> | 06:02.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4318 [AirForce One
>> 54g] 802.11g Wireless LAN C
Am 06.03.2012 um 20:31 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
> Stephan, Sven: Can you please provide the output of /proc/interrupts ?
Here is mine, from a freshly booted 3.3-rc6 kernel.
Cheers,
Sven
CPU0
0: 25050XT-PIC-XT-PICtimer
1:101XT-PIC-XT-PICi
Am 06.03.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> On Monday 05 March 2012, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> > On 2012-02-28 02:05 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>> >
>> > > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any
Am 06.03.2012 um 21:26 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Am 06.03.2012 um 20:31 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
>>
>> > Stephan, Sven: Can you please provide the output of /proc/interrupts ?
>>
>> Here is mine, from a freshly
On 2012-03-06 23:33 +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Subject: genirq: Clear action->thread_mask if IRQ_ONESHOT is not set
>
> Ok, can we get this fixed version tested too by people who saw the problem?
It works for me.
Cheers,
Sven
On 2013-03-18 22:06 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
This patch breaks resume from suspend on my system if the following
device is plugged in:
,
| $ lsusb | head -n1
| Bus 005 Device 002: ID 07d1:3c03 D-Link System
On 2013-03-19 19:17 +0100, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2013-03-18 22:06 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>> > 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> This patch breaks
On 2013-03-19 21:10 +0100, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> > In what way is resume broken?
>>
>> The kernel comes back, but the screen is black. Manually switching VT's
>> is possible, and if I type something I can se
On 2013-03-19 22:00 +0100, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2013-03-19 21:10 +0100, Alan Stern wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> >
>> >> > In what way is resume broken?
>>
On 2013-03-20 21:08 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:44:30PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2013-03-19 22:00 +0100, Alan Stern wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 2013-03-19 21:10 +0100
On 2012-07-12 21:24 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.5 release.
> There are 187 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
As has been noted alrea
On 2012-07-31 06:43 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
Alas, this does not build if CONFIG_SMP is unset:
,
| arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c: In function 'reload_store':
| arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c:304:19: error:
Hi,
I would like to see the following patch applied to the 3.5 kernel
series. It makes suspend work again on my machine.
Cheers,
Sven
>From 5378b764baca9268d8bc5ee9e991c9df4ec12050 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxim Levitsky
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:22:07 +0300
Subject: drm/nv86/fif
[ Resending since the previous attempt appears not to have reached
-stable. Apologies to everyone who receives duplicates. ]
Hi,
I would like to see the following patch applied to the 3.5 kernel
series. It makes suspend work again on my machine.
Cheers,
Sven
>From 5378b764baca9268d8
I would like to see commit 2064db725cc6d4ea19a24c138bc37939b63e3ae6
(drm/nv86/fifo: suspend fix) cherry-picked to the 3.5 kernel series, it
makes suspend work again on my machine. Could you please queue this up
for 3.5.4?
Apologies for thread hijacking, my attempts to directly send the request
to
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both 3.8.6-rc1 and
3.9-rc5: "udevd[56]: sender uid=65534, message ignored". Reverting the
patch below on top of 3
On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 13:41 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>> > 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> I'
On 2015-02-03 09:04 +0100, Zefan Li wrote:
> On 2015/2/3 0:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 05:21:21PM +0800, Zefan Li wrote:
>>> Greg, could you release 3.4.106 for me, please?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> ===
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 7fd7a446b1c2b96252e438974
On 2013-09-25 02:17 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 3.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
Sorry for being a bit late, I was traveling last week and only upgraded
my kernel yesterday.
> From: Imre Deak
>
> commit 2960bc9cceecb5d556ce1c07656a6609e2f7e8b0
On 2015-08-14 18:55 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:19:34AM +0200, Dick Snippe wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm sorry to bother you with this, but lwn.net reported a rather serious
>> security issue a couple of weeks ago:
>>
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/646590/
>> https://bugzilla.red
On 2013-07-19 07:25 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.2 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 2014-10-21 23:08 +0200, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> From: Ben Skeggs
>
> Hey,
>
> The majority of these are regression fixes
> - The first 4 patches together fix regressions in runtime pm support.
> - The ioremap fix is a long-time regression on some x86 systems with
> limited vmalloc space.
> - The
On 2014-04-14 09:48 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Linus Torvalds writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Brian Gerst wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't tested it recently but I do know it has worked on 64-bit
>>> kernels. There is no reason for it not to, the only thing not
>>> supported in l
On 2014-05-07 19:09 +0200, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 09:57 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> Afaik, 16-bit programs under wine already need
>>
>> echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr
>>
>> because they want to map things at address 0, so this isn't a new concept.
>>
>
> I think that
26 matches
Mail list logo
