Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 02:33:34 +0200
> Mathias Picker wrote:
>
>> Am 9. April 2023 20:55:58 MESZ schrieb Yoshihiro Ota :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been following releng/13.2 since it was branched.
>>> I use amd64 arch for this.
>>>
>>> I had built kernel modules during BETA/RC per
Chris wrote:
> On 2023-09-17 11:15, Alain Zscheile wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After upgrading from FreeBSD-13.1 to 13.2 I noticed that local-unbound
>> doesn't
>> appear to work anymore
>> (doesn't return DNS responses for anything, although I don't have
>> network traces).
>>
>> For now, I just disabled
Chris wrote:
> On 2023-09-18 08:26, Yuri wrote:
>> Chris wrote:
>>> On 2023-09-17 11:15, Alain Zscheile wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> After upgrading from FreeBSD-13.1 to 13.2 I noticed that local-unbound
>>>> doesn't
>
Pete French wrote:
> Am experimenting with stable/14 to see how it goes, but have an odd problem. I
> am compiling it on a stable/13 machine, as I was upgrading a 13 box to 14.
> But having
> done this, I now cannot don an installworld again with a slihtly more recent
> compile,
> as it fails, te
Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> what's the best platform/list/forum/... to discuss issues with the SNMP
> implementations
> for FreeBSD? Since I started to dig deeper into Obervium I found that of all
> the systems
> I own only the FreeBSD based ones present some challenges regarding the
Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> HI Yuri,
>
>> Am 19.12.2023 um 09:50 schrieb Yuri :
>> Let's start with OIDs, which ones exactly you are looking at (numeric or
>> textual will do)?
>
> To start I'll post the 4 odd ones of my OPNsense system, FreeBSD 13.2-p
Yuri wrote:
> Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>> HI Yuri,
>>
>>> Am 19.12.2023 um 09:50 schrieb Yuri :
>>> Let's start with OIDs, which ones exactly you are looking at (numeric or
>>> textual will do)?
>>
>> To start I'll post the 4 odd one
Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 23 Sep 2023, at 18:31, Frank Behrens wrote:
>>
>> I created a zpool with a FreeBSD-14.0-CURRENT on February. With
>> 15.0-CURRENT/14.0-STABLE from now I get the message:
>>
>> status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block size.
>> Expect r