Re: Upgrade to 13, zfs issues

2022-07-04 Thread Éric Masson
Peter Blok writes: Hi Peter, > I have the same issue on a couple of servers. I haven’t found a way to > correct this, but it wasn’t any problem upgrading and after the > upgrade everything worked ok. So you're telling that upgrading from stable/12 to stable/13 using https://docs.freebsd.org/en/

Problem ZFS send / receive 13.1-RELEASE

2022-07-04 Thread thilo jeremias
Hello everyone, I posted a question on ( https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/zfs-replication-interrupted-and-resumed-missing-snapshots.85666/ ) Which I now think is a bug in zfs send/receive for 13.1-RELEASE Essentially, an interrupted & restarted receive does not create all snapshots from the

Re: Problem ZFS send / receive 13.1-RELEASE

2022-07-04 Thread Alan Somers
It's not a bug. The problem is that you can't combine zfs send -R and also zfs recv -s . The former creates several independent send streams. But the latter generates a token that will only resume a single stream. And there's no way to fix the problem given ZFS's design. If the send gets interrup

Re: Upgrade to 13, zfs issues

2022-07-04 Thread Peter Blok
Yes, no issues except that on one server I forgot to do the etcupdate -B. It still worked ok, but an extra zpool wasn’t imported. Many of the servers were out of reach and headless, so I was pretty happy it worked so well. One aspect to consider: you need to do this with a kernel config that co

Re: Problem ZFS send / receive 13.1-RELEASE

2022-07-04 Thread thilo jeremias
Understood. Could this be documented in the man-pages (maybe near the zfs-send “-t” option)? Also I think, it would be “a nice to have feature” if this throws an error either at the receiving or sending side. (May be the sending options should be part of the transmission stream and the receiver

Re: Problem ZFS send / receive 13.1-RELEASE

2022-07-04 Thread Alan Somers
Yeah, it would be great if it could raise an error. I've run into this problem before. However, I can't figure out how. It's not easy, because the two incompatible flags apply to separate commands. The only way I can guess how to do it would be to add a flag to the send stream that says "the st

Fssh_kex_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host (anon...@git.freebsd.org)

2022-07-04 Thread John Kennedy
Sometime this AM (> 07:10:39 PST8PDT, < 08:15 2022/7/4) the anonymous git repo seems to have developed an issue: # git remote -v freebsd anon...@git.freebsd.org:src.git (fetch) freebsd anon...@git.freebsd.org:src.git (push) # git pull -v Fssh_kex_exchange_